Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
phtrivier
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Me, discovering only now that Hugging Face was founded by French people. We're definitely better at maths than at promotion.
32.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
I suspect the parent commenter agree with you : broadband access DID cost a lot of money - and in a sense, the project was rushed, and an unexpected demonstration that public / private partnerships with the wrong incentive structure ca
33.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
"Baby Boom + Life Expectancy..." I dread at the idea that some startup is probably in stealth mode, ready to "disrupt funerals" by the end of the year. (Also, I dread the fact that I know a few boomers that I would actua
34.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Yeah, but at least I could "get" the Hogan discussion on HN, because of the Peter Thiel connection. But I also understand how the comment might have rubbed many people the wrong way, given how she seems to be one of the last few &
35.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Ok, I learned something. I mean, her name ringed a bell, but it does not seem like her popularity crossed the Atlantic (not as much as other artist, I mean.) Again, I have nothing against her, but I was surprised.
36.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
I must be missing some context : why is this news considered worthy of HN ? Is there an inside joke with dolly parton and tech ? (The loss is sad, don't get me wrong, but it's the second submission I see..)
37.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
And now the other aspect of the trade off is token budget allocation. The author seems to be in a situation where you can burn as many token as you want. I don't know if that's a general situation. (Even if you don't care abo
38.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
It's not exactly done in a pinch, but yeah, I guess someone must be working on disrupting CIs by the audacious value proposition of "we'll work when you need to".
39.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
They also sell the machinery to produce the slop (through OpenAI at least). If they make it harder to push slop on github, people might treat it as an incentive to generate less slop. Less tokens sold. Bad. Very bad. The github paying custo
40.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
I understand the need to level-head the discussion and calming everyone. However, your "(you don't)" comment is not going to calm down all the people, who, you know, DO have a hotfix to push now, and DO have an angry customer
41.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
In a sense, when we use scraps from agriculture in a methanizer to produce "bio" gaz, we are "learning" from people still using biomass. It's just that we mediate it through ch4 to avoid some of the worst health ris
42.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Indeed. Especially since HN is probably considered "old and cranky" but the younger generation, who get their dose of language flamewars and JS framework from some other place that I can't know of. (Can you get a decent "
43.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
When you say "mostly because of AI", do you mean because there are so many posts about AI (and it's hard to keep up with the latest coding harness or version of a model, which seems to pop up at a rate close to js frameworks
44.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
People will not die to starve in place. They will move. Can their neighbors afford to deal with that ? And their neighbors's neighbors ? Our "sovereign borders defended by true patriots making whatever great again" are going
45.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Which is why I mentioned _decarbonization_, not only renewables ;) (wood stoves are always this weird thing to put in the carbon cycle. It's "recent" carbon, not carboniferous, so... the But they're not very efficient.)
46.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
Completely agree. On the last point : given enough climate events, "decarbonization" will become a "national security" topic. Who knows what happens next. (First chapter of "Ministry for the Future" always come
47.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
"WE" is an interesting word, isn't it ? The author obviously meant "humanity". Not "him and a bunch of friends". That being said, this is hacker news, this is for the elite, and startups can disrupt everyt
48.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
The news that something is going better is a bit less "selling" than the news that something is going bad. But this is hacker news, we're supposed to be elite, and so, reading news from MIT [1] : yes, the hole is still there,
49.
▲
by
phtrivier
1mo ago
And China has plans that have some decarbonization baked in - and even the US are decarbonizing, no matter what the current administration says. Can they decarbonize _fast enough_ ? No idea... India and the rest of asia will be interesting
50.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Thanks, and thanks for the effort on jank ! Since you're here ;) : I read on the alpha doc that protocols and other part of the clojure object model are not done yet - is your goal to include them eventually, or is there a part of the
51.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
How much does this overlap / complements something like jank ? [1] How much "production ready" / "battle tested" would this be ? (Not to start a flame war, I'm genuinely curious about the differences.) [1]
52.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
This law is entirely meant for retirees with landlines (the only constituency that matters anyway in our gerontocracy.) In a sense, it's good to have someone try to tackle an actual problem (I know it's a pain to have to pick up t
53.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Unrelated, but the gallery of "drag icon to Applications" contains a screenshot of Joost : does anyone remember that ? It could have been Netflix or Youtube a decade before, if only there had been, you know, any good show to watch
54.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Impossible to disagree with the author, and yet something seems missing in the discussion... Let me check: Ctrl-F, 'deadline' 0 result. Oh, yeah, that's what missing from the discussion. And without any trolling, I'm cur
55.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Wait, where is the half of the article where he explains what Bob is doing differently ? I'm pretty sure everyone else in the hackathon was working on something "that mattered" (although, it's facebook, so "what mat
56.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Come on, Trump would never "tarrif" something called "El Nino". He would first deport it a couple times.
57.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
> [post 1] "One of them is guilty, the other one is responsible" > [post 2] "Of course they share responsibility." > As I said, responsibility has to be shared. Fair enough. I should have written that they share
58.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Of course they share responsibility. Pay scraps for slop, expect slop. The more useful job of a politician may be similar to how managers in general have a "more useful" part of their jobs then publishing status report. "Gath
59.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
No, that politician trusted some poorly paid staff to write a boring procedural speech while he was doing something (hopefully more useful). The staff used an LLM and did not bother to check (or got their check wrong.) One of them is guilty
60.
▲
by
phtrivier
2mo ago
Oh, funny, I learned about her last week, in a biography of Alfred Nobel, but i only saw pictures of her young.
More ›