4 ms·
I understand the need to level-head the discussion and calming everyone. However, your "(you don't)" comment is not going to calm down all the people, who, you
by phtrivier 2mo ago
I understand the need to level-head the discussion and calming everyone.
However, your "(you don't)" comment is not going to calm down all the people, who, you know, DO have a hotfix to push now, and DO have an angry customer that could not care less for which part of our infrastructure is breaking _their_ workflow.
The only things would calm everyone down is guarantee that Microsoft would be paying for _our_ SLA breach compensation. But they don't. And I don't think anyone is paying their GH bill with a prorata of the number of time the platform was actually available.
(I'm also aware that the wording of the contract probably clearly says that you should not use GitHub for anything critical, that Microsoft is only a small startup in their garage, that you can't credibly expect 90% uptime anyway, and that it's all the fault of LLM slop ! Bad LLM slop ! Also, please buy our LLMs to generate more slop, please.)
- fn-mote 2mo agoIt's past time to move your critical infrastructure off Github then, no?
- phtrivier 2mo agoIt's not exactly done in a pinch, but yeah, I guess someone must be working on disrupting CIs by the audacious value proposition of "we'll work when you need to".
- maccard 2mo agoThat effectively means “stop using GitHub” though. Which is definitely worth considering but also kind of insane to think as the best option.