Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
phraseologist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
I only rejected his out-of-the-blue implementation of something that already had very different plans around it. There is room for whoever doesn't disregard what the readme says: "For code contributions, it's best to start ou
2.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
You never came to the TES3MP server at all. You came to an unofficial server for Lua scripters and decided to tell everyone you were changing the C++ code to add combat events as you wanted even though the combat system was being redesigned
3.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
Most of those bug fixes and complicated updates towards 0.47 were done by me on the work-in-progress branch, but you're pretending it's your credit somehow just because you took my unfinished work before I could do a release of it
4.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
Not if a family member has died.
5.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
There wasn't anything rude or combative in asking you to allow TES3MP to catch up with breaking changes in OpenMW one at a time, especially considering you had never interacted with anyone from TES3MP at all. Your attempt to take in ma
6.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
You've never contributed to OpenMW. If you tried the same kind of unilateralism regarding features with them, they wouldn't appreciate it either.
7.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
Development isn't halted, it was just slowed down by all the problems caused by the pandemic.
8.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
You're not "everyone", you're just someone who didn't read the contribution guidelines in the readme and still feels like complaining about it to this day.
9.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
If you are thinking of contributing, you should at least read what it says in the readme instead of pretending that not reading the readme was unfairly held against you: "For code contributions, it's best to start out with modestl
10.
▲
by
phraseologist
5y ago
This is incorrect. You decided you were going to do a unilateral implementation of a feature without discussing it at all. It was an anti-collaboration mindset from you.