phoneboy

4 ms·

1.
Towards Distributed Clouds(arxiv.org)
2 points by phoneboy 8y ago|0 comments
2.
Robots and politics(politico.com)
1 points by phoneboy 8y ago|0 comments
3.
How blockchain will disrupt GAFA(thenextweb.com)
1 points by phoneboy 9y ago|0 comments
4.
by phoneboy 9y ago
Not really a problem though is it. Compare with DASHs DAO that spend around 30M$ a year on improving and building the system.
5.
by phoneboy 9y ago
Distributed cloud and DApps
6.
by phoneboy 9y ago
I understand that even Estonia requires a manual process, with two witnesses at site to a property transaction. Then the question becomes how you digitize this on the blockchain?
7.
by phoneboy 9y ago
Don't be ridiculous, Google is a platform company. Any service they create contributes to the same platform. Hence, if search is a monopoly so is the rest of the services.
8.
by phoneboy 9y ago
Exactly, this is platform economics 101. If you missed this then read: Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for Yo
9.
by phoneboy 9y ago
So many people think they are experts on blockchain tech nowadays after reading a few ICO whitepapers. The point of public chains is to automate tasks, whatever that task may be. Stop thinking of blockchains as this limited thing we see in
10.
by phoneboy 9y ago
That's why we need decentralized solutions that break the hold the current centralized platforms have on us.
11.
by phoneboy 9y ago
The store is their way to control their ecosystem, has nothing to do with the OS. This effort is a power-play against decentralized apps that threaten the centralized platform model.
12.
by phoneboy 9y ago
I wish they stopped worrying about Google's and Facebook's possibility to profit of my data. Although I like f-fox, we do need a new alternative that support our privacy rights.
13.
by phoneboy 9y ago
You link it with your facebook id, anything you share in addition about your personal preferences is always of great interest.
14.
by phoneboy 9y ago
The next thing you should look at is who they send your personal data to and what data they send. There was rumors a year ago that they sent personal data to known advertiser IPs.
15.
by phoneboy 9y ago
I'd like to see other terms as well, incl. distributed ledger stuff.
16.
by phoneboy 9y ago
I'd like to see a sentiment for each article as well. If you add that, then add a green/red indicator on the price chart as well for when the news came out.
17.
by phoneboy 9y ago
He makes a loaded assumption that I don't agree with, "One of the key points of IoT is that it produces extremely large quantities of data which have very little value outside of the real-time element." Still Streamer integra
18.
A comparison between IOTA and Streamr(medium.com)
1 points by phoneboy 9y ago|1 comments
19.
by phoneboy 9y ago
We need the regulate the platforms. They all need to start implementing client-side processing if they want to do processing.
20.
by phoneboy 9y ago
why? please add some comment.
21.
Deep Learning and the Game of Go(manning.com)
17 points by phoneboy 9y ago|0 comments
22.
by phoneboy 9y ago
They use a term "privatized records" that is not directly recognized by the GDPR. If this is equivalent to data anonymization or pseudonymization is a mathematical proof, that I'm not familiar with. Still kudos to Apple for d
23.
NASA’s AI drone race a pro human pilot(theverge.com)
2 points by phoneboy 9y ago|0 comments
24.
by phoneboy 9y ago
Yet another failure at Google, is this the end of the Pixel line?
25.
Unfixable Google Pixel 2 XL(theverge.com)
2 points by phoneboy 9y ago|2 comments