philsquared_

7 ms·

31.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
No thank you.. I am waiting at this point for an open source local alternative. Not looking for a new monopoly... Also not a fan of the "plugin store" concept. Why not just keep it in the background. Why should I need to "ins
32.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Because they are completely different business models. If OpenAI decides to become an advertising behemoth then I would show concern. Right now they use your data for training (when they use it).
33.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Just use the API? It deletes your data after 30 days...
34.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Google takes your data and sells it. Literally making your data available to the highest bidder. Is OpenAI doing that? If Google existed in its current form during the early internet it would be classified in the same category as Bonzai Bud
35.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
We are a small business that provides a service. In business more than 30 years. We never win our disputes dispite providing mountains of evidence. At this point we dont even respond to them we simply file a lawsuit and add all our court fe
36.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
The reality is that ChatGPT, while not yet advanced enough to surpass Google, is just the beginning... Prior to ChatGPT, it was difficult to imagine a world without Google's dominance. Now it is very clear that Google has a real threat
37.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Because no one believes a random person can find arbitrage opportunities that hedge funds or high frequency traders are not already exploiting.. In this case I think most people are wrong. I think it is possible to still find arbitrage oppo
38.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Taking issue with any word with the word "man" in it is pretty dumb. Specifically "mankind" they suggest using the word "humankind". So if everyone starts using this word eventually slang will shorten it to &qu
39.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
You would only need one set of coordinates. The destination coordinates. Any high level chess players would only need that information to dominate.
40.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
This article is disgusting regardless of 'truth'. We are to the point now where we call a political assassination "successful" and spread the assassins' story as if there is/was just cause... What really is the
41.
by philsquared_ 4y ago
Craigslist is likely in the best position it has been in years... They rolled out charging for service/job listing posts a few years ago and I am sure they make a ton of money. Lots of people use craigslist regardless of Facebook marke
42.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
It is possible I am incorrect then. I remember it always taking 5 - 10 minutes before any funds hit my account. I never actually counted the confirmations so it is very possible I am just wrong and they were doing 0 conf. At the same time I
43.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
Because I am pretty sure it isn't true. I am one of the few people who used bitcoin on steam during this time and I don't remember it ever being instant. I would like to see clarification to the top point because I don't thin
44.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
Is that a rabbit hole you really want to jump down. Data can be biased and lead to incorrect conclusions. Best for you to not look at any statistics concerning race which leads to absolute false narratives.
45.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
I see.. What is being said is that vaccinated immunity is "less damaging" to acquire than natural immunity.
46.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
Every "booster" vaccination going into the arm of a low risk population is a vaccination that is being withheld from a vulnerable population in a less "privileged" country. The WHO specifically recommended to hold off on
47.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
How can it be inferior when 2 weeks after you recover from covid you cannot catch it again but 2 weeks after getting the vaccine you can catch covid?
48.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
I mean you probably could run a study of caffeinated vs un-caffeinated drivers. Or Modafinil vs Un-Modafinil drivers and I imagine the results would be: the ones with the drug perform better than the ones without. Expanding on this: I am su
49.
by philsquared_ 5y ago
This article (and argument) is the equivelant of saying "teenagers and senior citizens both cause more fatal accidents than any other age group. Obviously we need to ban them from the road because they are putting others at risk"