Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
phh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
451.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
My favorite part is: > All data collected through the TCF must now be deleted by the more than 1,000 companies that pay IAB Europe to use the TCF. This includes Google’s, Amazon’s and Microsoft’s online advertising businesses. It's
452.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Thank you :-) I wholeheartedly agree with you, and I'm sad not seeing it reported more often. I consider that Google Maps being free stagnated the maps market, and stopped any innovation from happening. Often when I say this, I get &qu
453.
▲
How Android updates work: A peek behind the curtains from an insider
(medium.com)
3 points
by
phh
5y ago
|
0 comments
454.
▲
Android updates – a peek behind the curtains
(medium.com)
1 points
by
phh
5y ago
|
0 comments
455.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
> Windows is not vetting all apps Actually, I'm pretty sure there has been some stuff that Microsoft signed, for which MS is paid (not 30% sure), that were malwares. But I'm too lazy to find it
456.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I fully agree there. In addition to software expectations, state-backed intelligence doesn't require any software (or hardware) security flaw to surveil you. If you're are a target of interest to them, there isn't much you ca
457.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I'm not aware of Microsoft ever being sued about the loss of malwares on Windows.
458.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
No it's not possible. Google Play hides some permissions on its own, but very basic one (like the one allowing access to internet). That's it. The dangerous permissions mentioned in the article need to be manually enabled by the u
459.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
This article is IMO very exaggerating issues there (please note that Google store shows that the app targets only Android >= 8.0, this has a huge impact for what's to follow) List of perms from the article: > Collect and send use
460.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Have we put all our computers in a trashcan since rowhammer?
461.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
(pretty sure most people will miss this answer, but anyway) So, to clarify things considering all the answers: - Qualcomm's development cost is shared amongst all OEMs (Except Google), because all OEMs share the same development branch
462.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Getting paid twice my current salary year to cherry-pick commits from one branch to another and click rebuild? Hell yes! Though Qualcomm get much cheaper engineers than me in India.
463.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
> You just have to bear the support costs yourself. Too expensive? I ported Android 12 on thousands of Android devices. I'm already bearing the support cost myself. Small proof, Android 12 on 17 of devices I bought with my money to
464.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Yeah so uh, Sony is super weird. There is the production side of Sony, and the developer side of Sony. They barely coexist, they are two completely different minds. Think I'm exaggerating? They have two bootloaders, one for developers,
465.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Google's big argument to say they aren't upgrade pixels, is that they can't guarantee security of binary blobs. Fuchsia does nothing to help this.
466.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
> It forces you to develop in ways that are not natural for people that work with hardware My employer still upgrades 10yrs old TV boxes just fine. (Rocking Linux 5.4 LTS, launched on 2.6) It is not natural for companies whose business m
467.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Samsung definitely makes Qualcomm devices. So that argument is bullshit.
468.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Can you guarantee there won't be an unpatchable boot ROM security flaw in three years of devices' "support" span?
469.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Obviously YMMV, but last year there was exactly one OEM merging kernel LTS (Sony). While many (dare I say most?) Custom ROMs do.
470.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I want to answer that Qualcomm-is-the-issue again. You're pointing out how ridiculous it is, but let me expand: So, as an order of magnitude, the price asked by Qualcomm for extended support is 1M$. That's 10c/device. The VoL
471.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I understand where you're at, and I honestly have no idea what I could recommend you to do to find, BUT I can answer your question: > People who have really great jobs(not talking about money ofc), how did you find them? It's b
472.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
That's kinda what chromebooks do, though even better. There is a physical screw, that you can unscrew to rewrite the read-only part of firmware (which ofc contains secure boot keys)
473.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Which reminds me of a catastrophe movie, where all countries launched all their nukes, and earth became radioactively poisoned. A submarine survived, looking for signs of life, and they received sporadic messages like "the whales are f
474.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Nexus were never premium. It was cheap-ish high-end SoC best demonstration of Android OS. However, Pixels are definitely meant to be flagships, and IMO they are still not worth that name. Anecdata: my Samsung Galaxy Note 2 fell quite litera
475.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
iPhone SE (which you seem to describe as "budget price experience" considering the message you're replying too) base price is 489€. I can buy 2 very decent budget price Android devices for that amount of money. 6 if I don
476.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I don't see the lie. As I said, I don't remember them ever saying that it was safe without mask. They only said it was not useful. I would actually say that at the time, it was counter-productive for the general public to wear mas
477.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
Well yes the information was there, I remember clearly that back then, we had the "perfect" measurement (for such an early study that is): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_on_Diamond_P... 14 pe
478.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
> I remember vividly president Macron (a person that I respected before that) very serious in TV explaining to all the citizens of the republic that we should not buy nor wear masks. I don't remember this from Macron, but rather fr
479.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
I think the author missed the "semantic" part. If you push your own SQLite, then no, I don't have the semantic meaning of the website. Only a standardized semantic file format ala RDF can achieve that.
480.
▲
by
phh
5y ago
> However I must be able to use colors for free if all I'm doing is getting it for a non commercial project of mine. Nope. IMO it's safe (from the floss side) to assume companies won't be cheating. Don't get me wrong.
More ›