petersjt014

6 ms·

1.
by petersjt014 7y ago
I just found one for events that actually looks good: https://joinmobilizon.org/en
2.
Ask HN: Is Powershell Any Good on Linux?
1 points by petersjt014 7y ago|0 comments
3.
by petersjt014 7y ago
Yep. The Financial Times: https://github.com/Financial-Times/tapper Discord: https://blog.discordapp.com/using-rust-to-scale-elixir-for-1... Pintrest, who seems to really like it (note the highlighted
4.
by petersjt014 7y ago
If you want a _really_ lightweight matrix client, I'd say <300 lines of Go would be pretty light. Go is quite portable too: https://gitlab.com/meutraa/mm/tree/master
5.
by petersjt014 7y ago
My guess--based on my singular experience--would be obscurity. I've never heard of it. Looks really nice though, A StackOverflow/Discord hybrid is a fascinating idea--could easily be groundbreaking.
6.
by petersjt014 7y ago
I should also say that Matrix has a lot of other really nice aspects to it that give Discord and friends a run for their money: - Open source. Self-explanatory. - Federated. Sure, you can probably redundant-ify your IRC server with Apache
7.
by petersjt014 7y ago
A closer equivalent would be riot.im's servers, which are free in the same way as Discord/IRC's public rooms are. If you wanted custom integrations or the like you'd have to pay out for it, but the free option's sti
8.
by petersjt014 7y ago
Voice chat is apparently harder to implement, but it's still possible to do right now with Jitsi [1]. And even without it, Matrix supports an 'opt-in' style of voice channel that should work fine with smaller groups. [1]: ht
9.
by petersjt014 8y ago
I've personally had no problems with them (save for one near heart-attack where I lost multiple keys), but I'd suggest looking at their documentation too [1]. It's also worth noting that you don't need to store any keys
10.
by petersjt014 8y ago
Probably not the answer you were looking for, but one of the best ways is to simply just _make_ something of your own. At the very least it's good practice, and you just might make something people find useful if you've found an &
11.
by petersjt014 9y ago
Nice to see him finally at terms after that one 1997 game--he seems to have been touchy about it even as recently as 2014: "I think we'll never know unless Kasparov says himself, but you probably won't get to talk to him beca
12.
by petersjt014 9y ago
I know these guys understand quantum anything more than I ever will, but is having a larger radix specifically a practical way for increasing performance? If a binary device has a hardware fault, bits that are in error still have a 50% chan
13.
by petersjt014 9y ago
> All it does is mechanically keep on steering the game towards positions that are evaluted as best by the function. I wouldn't say so entirely--It's possible to predict multiple moves ahead (before the number of possibilities
14.
by petersjt014 9y ago
Well... http://theconversation.com/preservationists-race-to-capture-...
15.
by petersjt014 9y ago
I certainly understand where you're coming from and what you're probably thinking of (Eternal September is the name I know it by)--but I did try to make my comment both relevant and funny. I personally think I did okay there, but
16.
by petersjt014 9y ago
Of course, we all know what they would have used if they were real pros: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial_number_system