personomas

11 ms·

61.
by personomas 3y ago
Yeah, I'm assuming, but I also make that clear with my statement, that I'm basing my statement only on what the person above me wrote. That doesn't mean either that I believe 100% what I wrote myself, but they're importa
62.
by personomas 3y ago
Politicians on the other hand wield their power on these matters without contention or rebuke - they ransack companies and nobody can say anything or do anything about it! That's the difference. In the face of politicians vs C-suite bu
63.
by personomas 3y ago
No, the reasons go on and on. China is a f***ing wrecking ball, and Huawei is one of their little puppets into the West.
64.
by personomas 3y ago
In America, sure. Come over to Europe where successful companies are the politician's escape-goat. "The world is burning, and it's because of the rich, business owners, and high paying businessmen". Furthermore, the Euro
65.
by personomas 3y ago
See! The authorities don't even have a tangible reason, they just search because they want to. Now, because this is Huawei, I don't disagree per se, but that's a different matter. This company should just be outright banned f
66.
by personomas 3y ago
You assume an upright and just state. Raids are also used by the authorities to: 1) steal legitimate and legal intellectual property 2) while they perform the raid, they search for other reasons to find them guilty of something 3) m
67.
by personomas 3y ago
These C-suite successful companies were at least built and designed by successful people, who succeeded by being moral human beings at least more moral than most scummy politicians. Even if the C-suite companies are no longer directed by th
68.
by personomas 3y ago
> This is the kind of things police will do if they have a warrant (or the local equivalent) in any sane democracy. Democracy does not mean that we have to let companies get away with crime or nicely tell them before a search so they can
69.
by personomas 3y ago
Totally agree. This is behavior of authoritative and totalitarian governments, who demand to have so much authority and power, that they need to attack and undermine the most successfully businesses, bending the laws to do so (or creating a
70.
by personomas 3y ago
It looks like you're explaining this well, but I still don't understand what you're saying.
71.
by personomas 3y ago
When will this be available? (Thanks in advance)
72.
by personomas 3y ago
Oh great let's instead let the world flounder forever and constantly civil wars in countries and endless amount of people fleeing, mass migration, endless resource consumption through endless amount of population boom, societies so bac
73.
by personomas 3y ago
Start with military intervention / invasion. Then run the country, but not as a colony of exploitation, but instead of general good intentions with fairness, justice, etc. Then obviously you can set laws that limit birth, like one chil
74.
by personomas 3y ago
No way should we even allow this to happen. Countries shouldn't continue to boom in population when their societies can't even function.
75.
by personomas 3y ago
Confirmed. In fact, it started mostly in Europe, then came to the other English countries, hitting US last of all.
76.
by personomas 3y ago
Of course they're not the same, but before people can developer higher spiritual or social purposes they have to develop their material life. For most people, on top of what I just side in the previous sentence, developing their materi
77.
by personomas 3y ago
The states of Germany and Austria take away a persons purpose because these states are very authoritative and oppressive. Governments shouldn't try to give people a purpose, but they should develop a country via laws that enable or enc
78.
by personomas 3y ago
unless you live closer to the Suez canal...
79.
by personomas 3y ago
Interesting, thanks.
80.
by personomas 3y ago
What about using terraform instead of Pulumi? Why did you pick Pulumi for this?
81.
by personomas 3y ago
What do you mean? I don't understand.
82.
by personomas 3y ago
Exactly. Though, I definitely don't think economic decline is ok at this moment in our society especially while we burn through as much resources as we do.
83.
by personomas 3y ago
It's disgraceful to me how somebody could downvote your comment. Like you said, it's an objectionable comment, not even a subjective one. The HN crowd has become brainwashed by Woke media. Anything that disagrees with their opinio
84.
by personomas 3y ago
Ok, I'm wrong, sorry. But my point original still holds. See @3cats-in-a-coat for more details.
85.
by personomas 3y ago
Read the post up above by @3cats-in-a-coat
86.
by personomas 3y ago
This is a really fantastic summary. Thank you.
87.
by personomas 3y ago
Ok, perhaps it's true. But in Germany, almost all social programs or union-type programs are funded somehow through taxes. Perhaps though Unions are different.
88.
by personomas 3y ago
And where do these unions get their money from?
89.
by personomas 3y ago
Can you show me a link to this? I don't believe that.
90.
by personomas 3y ago
> A month into its strike, IF Metall is firmly dug in for the long haul. Striking workers are being fully compensated for lost pay. This idea of striking for ever and getting paid for striking is insanity. Europe is brutal to businesses.

More ›