persnicker

5 ms·

1.
by persnicker 2y ago
Neat edge case! Perhaps SAFE notes or other dividend-paying instruments should account for this by capping executive salaries or trigger dividend payouts at a certain salary dollar amount. Though, admittedly, I've never heard of a foun
2.
by persnicker 2y ago
"Investors' worst nightmare" seems very off. Most SAFE notes give you dividends that are on par with how corporations issue dividends. Assuming there is cash flow, you should be getting dividends. If the dividends are so low
3.
Silicon Valley Tech Investor Orchestrated Takedown Plot of Startup Toptal(cnbc.com)
39 points by persnicker 2y ago|7 comments
4.
by persnicker 2y ago
What's the point of ever so slightly changing it?
5.
by persnicker 2y ago
Corrected, thank you.
6.
by persnicker 2y ago
"The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday made it nearly impossible for Americans to sue federal law enforcement officers who violate their constitutional rights, further narrowing the already limited path to hold U.S. officials accountable
7.
by persnicker 2y ago
If it's so misleading then explain why.
8.
by persnicker 2y ago
When Chevron was active you could not challenge the US constitution not applying to border patrol because of Chevron. This is literally the CPBs only line of defense. In the next year I would imagine there will be a movement to overturn wha
9.
by persnicker 2y ago
It was never allowed to be challenged post 1984. Searching cellphones and seizures only started in the 2000s. Before 1953 people didn't even need CPB. Your counterpoint is outrageous.
10.
by persnicker 2y ago
Just keep in mind that the Chevron case allowed the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the United States to literally throw out the US constitution and say that the US constitution does not apply to you or protect you and anyone on the
11.
by persnicker 2y ago
If every commit of software had the potential to put someone in prison or ruin their life based on a law that didn't exist though the agency itself interpreted for their own self-interest, I would certainly want a meeting for every com
12.
by persnicker 2y ago
This is a fantastic outcome. If you give an agency the power to interpret the law that congress has prescribed to the agency, the agency will almost always chose an interpretation that is in their self-interest - often leading to a corrupt