perlmutterlabs

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by perlmutterlabs 8y ago

   Completely agree. This is how power works. Note that I said "could" in the original post ... Type 1. Some things "could" be with enough power backing them, Type 2. While others could never be regardless of power backing
2. 2.▲
   by perlmutterlabs 8y ago

   This kind of statement is hard to argue, as incentive to conceal technological ability is likely baked into the game. So then what's your threat model?
3. 3.▲
   by perlmutterlabs 8y ago

   "Parallel Construction" ... yep, sad times https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction
4. 4.▲
   by perlmutterlabs 8y ago

   Taking a guess: ML is just too good. Don't forget, it's also a signal to leave surveillance areas, eg "last seen driving into the desert". Any kind of outlier behavior is PART of the detection model ... that's where
5. 5.▲
   by perlmutterlabs 8y ago

   Yeah, it's a great story, but machine vision + machine learning + surveillance could pull the rug out from the dropgangs market in a second. But really, other than this fatal flaw, it's a great narrative of the internet spilling i