pellenys

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pellenys 8mo ago

   Agreed. That’s the one area where I think my experience will still have value (for a while anyway): translating customer requests into workable UI/UX, before handing off to the LLM.
2. 2.▲
   by pellenys 8mo ago

   Absolutely. I never thought I’d have to retrain, and I’m still uncertain if I will have to because I’m not really sure where software development will be in the next few years. It was quite an epiphany to run my first agent on a code base a
3. 3.▲
   by pellenys 1y ago

   I totally get where you’re coming from but for me it’s the predictability that’s key. Hamburger menus are familiar but they’re also not always there. On a traditional native UI you’d always have a menu bar, you’d always have a File and Edi
4. 4.▲
   by pellenys 1y ago

   I think usability almost always suffers when the native UI isn’t used. It’s not that platform-neutral UIs aren’t usable, or good looking. However when native UIs were prevalent, there were standards built up over years of hard-earned experi
5. 5.▲
   by pellenys 3y ago

   Shudder
6. 6.▲
   by pellenys 3y ago

   The casual nature is what made it so popular. You could write some fairly disciplined code with VB6, but once you turned Option Explicit off and added some On Error Resume Nexts and embraced variants, you had something you could write with