Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
peeters
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
241.
▲
by
peeters
4y ago
These days with the prevalance of HTTPS, another option is to inspect the TLS client hello packet. To work well with load balancers etc, clients typically indicate the server name that they're trying to connect to (SNI - https:/
242.
▲
by
peeters
4y ago
Stardew Valley had at least one well-shared spreadsheet for planting schedules and expected yields.
243.
▲
by
peeters
4y ago
Some informative background about this release here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-pNS5mDExQ . I found it really interesting; it includes comparisons against past telescopes, insight into what physical limits come into
244.
▲
by
peeters
4y ago
> Still, 35lb or so of pulling effort to activate the handle. It's like trying to drag a 4yo kid with both hands, except the handle is much thinner. The negative g's are doing the pulling in this case though, all the passenger
245.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Private takeovers usually assume a premium share price. The more credible a buyout offer is, the closer the stock price will rise to the offered price. It's exactly what got Musk in trouble for tweeting about taking Tesla private in
246.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I'm not sure what is needed from the board here, but I think there's a difference between a board recommending something, and having a fiduciary duty to present an offer to shareholders. Where are you reading that this needs the
247.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
By definition a hostile takeover is one that is done without the blessing/recommendation of the current board of directors. Most private takeovers are negotiated by the board/management (ostensibly on behalf of the shareholders).
248.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
They are misquoting their own source: > The spatial disorientation, or vertigo, suffered by the pilot is very common and causes accidents that cost the U.S. military more than $300 million and about 30 lives every year [1] Lives, not pil
249.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
> If you don’t want to offer the freedoms of a licence then pick a different one. That's exactly what they did. Namely, they crafted a custom license that combined requirements from two other licenses -- granted in a confusing way.
250.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
There are a number of things like this that I don't think will move the needle on housing prices, but because of the massive seller's market we're in, are politically expedient to do now: - Make home inspections an unwaivab
251.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Blind bids prevent bidding wars, but from an idealistic standpoint they don't find the true price of a home. Particularly when you have buying agents routinely advising their clients to bid 50k over what turns out to be the next h
252.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
> It's almost like the FSF intended to trick the authors who choose AGPL into not realizing what terms they were licensing their work under. Yeah I don't really understand the logic here. It's almost like they're con
253.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Not a lawyer, have no law training...but I have a hard time seeing how any other interpretation than this court would be viable. At its heart, this is a matter of contradictory clauses in a contract. One clause says you can't do someth
254.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Plenty of things are public but are unethical to broadcast, and can range from benign to extremely creepy or harassment.
255.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I'm pretty neutral on Musk but he has an established track record of saying stupid shit on Twitter and ruining others' days/lives. Market manipulation, libel, trolling, etc. I guess I don't trust that a man with that k
256.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
It's pretty interesting that the most "polarized" judges still only disagreed 34% of the time.
257.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Is anything stopping app developers from forming a (non-workers) union to collectively bargain and advocate for its members? This seems like something where if every app developer paid dues to a central body, with the insurance that each d
258.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I hear this sort of remark a lot, but does anyone actually practice this? Like git is great in that there a myriad of options for syncing remotes, but none that I've ever seen come close to having a central clone that also acts as t
259.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
This is worth having if only for pushing with --set-upstream origin. For those averse to four-letter words, it's trivially simple to alias as well. I have mine set to "ugh". eval "$(thefuck --alias ugh)"
260.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
> I'm surprised so many people trust their software and operating systems As opposed to what? Creating your own OS and software down to the silicon?
261.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
Ah thanks for the explanation. Makes a lot more sense with the fractional expansion.
262.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
This doesn't seem quite right, unless I'm misunderstanding. If your bias was 128 (10000000) by your algorithm you would get heads at least 50% of the time (heads on the first flip) and tails at least 25% of the time (heads then t
263.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I've done that for paired programming, it was a decade ago, but IIRC Xorg made it pretty easy to set up. That said...do not recommend :). It's too jarring.
264.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
> No fly-zones. It's pretty clear that falls into the category of something the West can do, but chooses not to out of fear. NATO shooting down Russian planes is war between nuclear powers. This isn't Libya. This isn't t
265.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
The U.S. isn't officially neutral, so lend-lease is pointless in this case. The west is already overtly arming Ukraine.
266.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
As someone who has watched a few parliamentary sessions, I smile at the thought of training computers on those recordings. Ever look at a Markov Chain output and think "those are paragraphs of text saying nothing at all"? Well,
267.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I think it's useful to distinguish between what a President says , and what he uses his executive powers to do . As far as what he did , I think the most impactful was probably drastically reducing press briefings in which the free
268.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I think you're fixated on the inverse of what this is. Imagine it's a true commit by Linus identified by his email address. This issue is when someone creates a GitHub profile with Linus' email address and by doing so, caus
269.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
> The problem is that GitHub makes this association even for unverified email addresses. In this case of course it really was Linus who made the first commit, but all it took was someone to add Linus's email address to their GitHub
270.
▲
by
peeters
5y ago
I think you're missing the point of what the author is asking. Showing the email address from the commit is one thing (and the author is fine with showing that). That's the limit to what git gives you. Associating that email add
More ›