Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pedrocr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
301.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The derivation that in total the passives outperform the actives is not a statistical result from historical data and doesn't require efficient market assumptions at all. It's just basic arithmetic that holds over any time period
302.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
It can crash even more violently by being removed from the index, which would happen if someone actually cornered the market for that stock as I described. My point is that the situation is unrealistic but in a completely different way than
303.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
In your hypothetical 99.9% passive scenario that doesn't work either because passive funds have long ago disallowed borrowing their stocks to short. If you start with a ~100% passive premise the reality is so different to what a normal
304.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
You didn't break down anything step by step. If you actually start with an 100% passive market and try having a single active investor in it nothing works. Funds can no longer buy and sell the basket of stocks they need. At that point
305.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
You can't sell stock short specifically to passive investors. You have to sell it into the market. And since you're trying to sell only that stock and passive investors are buying the whole market your actual net counterparty is a
306.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
How are you going to hoard "at no risk"? You're trying to corner the market for a given stock in an index pushing it's price way up and thus exposing yourself to the price crashing down and wiping you out. Meanwhile the
307.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Your active strategies are not against passive traders, they're against other active traders. You can't create one of those differential bets trading only with index funds as they won't take the other side of the unbalanced p
308.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
One thing I didn't find on the website was a way to get an email with the actual data that was leaked so I can evaluate what's at stake. Showing it online would be poor privacy but sending it to the email should solve that. Some o
309.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
That's not a paradox. People will not defend your point of view, they will defend your right to express it even though they think you're wrong.
310.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
So time() is actually days since epoch with 1/86400 precision. That makes the Google solution to smear leap seconds with NTP instead of making them explicit make even more sense.
311.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The X1 nano is the same width and height as a X220 but half the thickness and significantly lighter. The X13 is very close to that too on the lower end. What would you change in those? Having been a user of the old X lines throughout the ye
312.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
With the quality of networks these days it may pay off to just have a single beefy desktop at work or home and a very simple desktop in the other location that you just use to remote in to the first. Keeps the environment consistent over ti
313.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> Even with that, everywhere I’ve lived with hydro power had backup fossil fuel generation, which was periodically used, though rarely. > Arguments for all other forms of renewables at scale right now seem to depend on having/mai
314.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
For 2) last time I looked I couldn't find a way to have a memory contract with the kernel that allowed for a given allocation to be evicted at will by the kernel while also telling the application that has happened. This would be ideal
315.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Fuel-cell proponents keep claiming they're just around the corner but the issues with them are fundamental. ~3x the total energy use because of all the inefficiencies, and needing an all new infrastructure compared to BEVs where the gr
316.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
It's a little bit more than just culture. The Wayland protocol has made the compositor, window manager and window server concepts a single thing whereas in X those are provided by different applications talking a standardized protocol.
317.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Sure, but as a side benefit. Maybe someone has actually proposed doing SMRs distributed over the country and heating all houses directly, but as far as I know it's never been done. It's usually preferred to have nuclear plants iso
318.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> Heat and transport are the dominant areas, and both are still mostly fossil-based. Nuclear is not used for any of those either. And to use nuclear for heat and transport the easiest way is to just turn it into electricity and use EVs a
319.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> There isn't much growth potential for hydro But there's significant potential in wind, particularly offshore. > That means you need to overbuild PV and wind independently, which may be an option but a costly one. Quite the
320.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Hydro and wind have the opposite seasonal variability to solar. And since some hydro allows shifting energy during the day even in summer it may be enough for a mix that solves both seasonal and daily/weekly variability. Build enough w
321.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> allow wide sharing of the total European hydro power resource, which is about 6 weeks of full load European output I'm surprised it's this big. This sounds like enough grid scale storage/dispatch to do 100% renewables. P
322.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> 1GB symmetric (which in practice has been a true 1Gb down, ~300mb up) > service was not nearly as good (1gb/50) Units gore. From context you almost certainly mean Gb/s and Mb/s. mb and gb are weird units that although
323.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
If Goldman had a way to guarantee returns above the market why would they sell that to anyone? Or put it another way, who is the sucker that is taking the other side of those Goldman trades to get returns guaranteed to be below market? Tota
324.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
For 1) alpha is what you don't want when investing in index funds. Index funds can only stop working if they stop being able to track the market. That can happen if they're such a big part of the market that trading is effective
325.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The difference is that our ability to tell if Brady was a good football player 10 years ago doesn't depend on his results today. Whereas a fund manager can turn out to have had a bad strategy all along whose gains are only wiped out af
326.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Not sure what you mean by needing an EV to use the energy. With an A/C system you can heat and cool the house with electricity efficiently. Since that works even if your car is away with you at work the battery size is reduced making t
327.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The 3 to 5x difference between those cells and commercial offerings make me hopeful we'll see the market for home batteries take off relatively soon. LFP are ideal for the application and are already cheap. With the cost of rooftop sol
328.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
200 miles is not even 200 miles in summer when doing a road trip. Highway miles are less efficient than the average of the test cycle, and much less efficient if you drive on the faster side.
329.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Demand is not inelastic so the 30% drops if the supply becomes more expensive as orders will be cancelled.
330.
▲
Texas Electric Bills Were $28B Higher Under Deregulation
(wsj.com)
134 points
by
pedrocr
6y ago
|
153 comments
More ›