Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
peder
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
peder
3mo ago
I don't think Trump has ever said he's in favor of a small govt
32.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
I mean, this is just basic smart investing today. Software is now very easily replicable, and you wouldn't want to invest in software that has absolutely no moat. At a minimum, this gives Bain more leverage when negotiating with these
33.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
> Don't you think a smarter way to run a business is to capture more of the market if you have the resources to do so? Because if everyone is doing the same, then it's just brutal competition. Margins will squeeze, and eventual
34.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
Exactly right, it's Porter's Five Forces with Threats of Substitutes and Threats of New Entrants, which means that margins will be compressed massively, which means that being a lawyer will often mean lower wages. The p99() of law
35.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
I just did the same. Absolutely awful. I assume OpenCode's heavy context is a problem, and it's probably better to use Liquid's own OpenCode alternative for this.
36.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
ha, exactly... like, the % change could be minuscule (or worse, it might only be a perceived difference, the actual quality may have regressed, or the scenario just didn't lend itself to that specific model) but people will be on here
37.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
> I don't see the business model working. Same. It's a nightmare from a Porter's Five Forces perspective. There will be a ton of businesses competing in this space, and there will be something of a moat due to how capital
38.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
Right, and it’s just the wrong, maybe weirdest correlation to suggest, and I’m someone that loves to find unexpected connections between things. ZIRP had nothing to do with this “no-man” phenomenon, it predated ZIRP.
39.
▲
by
peder
4mo ago
And in the agentic world, that liability is both minimized and amplified. Teams that successfully mitigate AI risks will be able to churn out massive amounts of sustainable code.
40.
▲
by
peder
5mo ago
Bruh. This is unhinged. SpaceX is a good company with a ton of potential future revenue on their data center and Starlink businesses. Nothing about this company is fugazzi.
41.
▲
by
peder
5mo ago
> a UI that makes claude code or codex accessible to the average user. It'll just be power users. We're moving toward a world of significantly fewer analysts and more into "Super SMEs" that can actually learn tools li
42.
▲
by
peder
5mo ago
> Looks like Elon's finally giving up on XAI and just selling the compute I don't think that's certain yet, but I do think that the open-source models like Gemma and Qwen are getting so good so fast that even Anthropic has
43.
▲
by
peder
5mo ago
And adding climate hysteria here diminishes the climate change argument generally. It's like "the boy who cried wolf".
44.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
> It really seems like we could be at the dawn of a new era similiar to flash We've been there for a while.... creativity has been the primary bottleneck
45.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Irrelevant if you can keep doing decapitation strikes on leadership.
46.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
lol no, they both have lost substantial influence in Iran... the US has been chipping away at the spheres of influence for both China and Russia in recent months, first with Venezuela and now Iran. Hopefully Cuba is next. And the US surveil
47.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
You arguably can't run gorilla large-scale manufacturing. There are obvious limits to what you can achieve when the opposition can run decapitation strikes every few months.
48.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Exactly, but Hacker News is upvoting this because it wants the US to be seen as the loser of this conflict. Both sides in a conflict (or any negotiation) make demands that they know the other will not accept. You can't just take someon
49.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
But we can eliminate 90% of senior leadership at any time. How do they measure that cost?
50.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
This is not the deal. Iran had published this earlier as their list of demands, just like the US did. The reality is something in the middle of that.
51.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
But tech debt with vibe coding is fixed by just throwing more magic at it. The cost of tech debt has never been lower.
52.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Have you been using `omlx serve`? If so, how are you bumping up the max context size? I'm not seeing a param to go above 32k?
53.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Did you have any Anthropic vs OpenAI specification issues with Claude Code? I have been using mlx_vlm and vMLX and I get 400 Bad Request errors from Claude Code. Presumably you're not seeing those issues with llama-server ?
54.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
> I feel like this design direction is leaning more towards a chat interface as a first class citizen and the code itself as a secondary concern. That's because that's exactly where we're headed, and it's fine.
55.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
And despite saying that they're the party of YIMBY, in practice we can clearly see that Democrats simply aren't. They'll say that they allowed ADUs, but then Dallas will come along and build 10,000 homes in the time it took S
56.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Right, it's not an inherently left vs right thing. Today NIMBYism has been largely a left-wing phenomenon, with really high end housing developments that are politically untouchable by housing projects. The answer is always the same
57.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Housing prices cratered in China, because, yes, eventually supply catches up and then the ponzi schema has nowhere to go but down. Lots of people hold real estate thinking it's an investment just by itself, so it's been a viciou
58.
▲
by
peder
6mo ago
Leftists doing anything except just building more housing Rent is falling all over the Southeast where housing has been built in droves, and actually in greater quantities than new demand. The only solution is just flooding the market wit
59.
▲
by
peder
7mo ago
I feel an ocular migraine coming on looking at these. On CRT displays, did these not cause visual problems in the same way? I remember having no trouble looking at these years ago.
60.
▲
by
peder
7mo ago
> A lot of people are venally or ideologically motivated against accepting this. That’s the story of the last 10 years among certain types that keep regurgitating obviously wrong concepts.
More ›