pebau

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   ah, I see now - the reference is to the RDA article, not to the recent update published in the Springer Big Data Journal: https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s... my bad, sorry!
2. 2.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   oh, sure - both model multi-dimensional situations, just not necessarily with spatio-temporal semantics (see the famous data warehouse example of a sales cube: time x products x subsidiaries). Operations on abstract level are relatively sim
3. 3.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   PostgreSQL can just implement the SQL/MDA (MUlti-Dimensional Arrays) standard; they are famous for implementing virtually all of SQL, so this might come in future. PostGIS Raster is an on-top attempt which is benchmarked in the paper a
4. 4.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   hm, on p 8 I do not see a graphics, can you give the number please? If it is Fig 4: I had quite some interaction with the final editing team as they wanted to have every graphics with full page width, regardless of the intended (and submitt
5. 5.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   another PS: the article is not only about benchmarking, but also about a detailed, deep functionality comparison of 19 array tools.
6. 6.▲
   by pebau 6y ago

   Interesting discussion evolving! Disclaimer: I am co-author of that paper as well. That said: you may call it "suspicious" if the authors come to that conclusion, but on the same grounds it is likewise suspicious if the writer of