pear01

14 ms·

181.
by pear01 1y ago
if it is truly "objective" then his subjective experience is irrelevant, so your logic makes no sense. it is not necessarily incorrect to investigate or be skeptical about another's self reported "subjective" claims
182.
by pear01 1y ago
Should the government be able to blackmail credit card companies? Do you really think the credit card companies care where you spend your money? All they want you to do is spend more. They are trying to get out ahead of your own fellow citi
183.
by pear01 1y ago
I do like bringing up the potential for dissolution. I would add just the general ways in which they profit off distorting the economy for massive private gains, often to the ruin of many individuals. Credit has become ubiquitous, in a mann
184.
by pear01 1y ago
Just some feedback: Most people are going to ask about the difference between you and the incumbents. Mentioning spies in this regard - especially at this stage - even as a passing joke imo comes off as a little odd. You're pretty earl
185.
by pear01 1y ago
I get it and yes, you are technically correct that they are not "literally blocking" it. I just hope you can also see where I'm coming from. In context of the larger comment thread your reply felt like a nitpick that missed t
186.
by pear01 1y ago
You don't seem to grasp the argument. From above: > These people will never actually ban pornography > Not sure how one can say that with a straight face when there are US states that literally block pornhub, but okay You then sa
187.
by pear01 1y ago
The bills still passed so what's your point? The protest failed.