pdx

14 ms·

91.
by pdx 10y ago
Instead of engaging in amateur psychoanalyzing of your educated acquaintance because he dares praise Putin's speech, you could have also chosen to read it yourself. Here, let me help you. https://www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F
92.
by pdx 10y ago
> Globalism is good for people overall Globalism may indeed be good for 3rd world countries, as their wages and the wages of 1st world countries will tend to converge. This is obviously not good for 1st world workers, who still have 1st
93.
by pdx 10y ago
This was posted separately, but flagged for some reason. It talks about what Trump will do first 100 days in office. https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU- 102316-Contractv02.pdf
94.
by pdx 10y ago
I am being polite and laying out the reasons why you need to examine your beliefs. Nobody said you need to know every event in Syria to form an opinion. You just need to know about a single, proven event that supports the war hysteria narr
95.
by pdx 10y ago
Sorry, but anybody who support Hezbollah is given the moniker "State sponser of terrorism". Iran and Syria support Hezbollah because they are unhappy with Israels expansion. Lots of people are unhappy with Israels expansion. How
96.
by pdx 10y ago
There's no proof that he targeted civilians. He may have, he may not have. How do you know he did? Who told you so? 1) It's a war. There is a fog of war where accurate information is not always available. 2) It'
97.
by pdx 10y ago
Am I defending he used Sarin? Hell yes. That's already disproved. Am I defending he may have killed civilians while bombing rebels? Well, not defending, but putting in perspective, since we kill civilians almost daily. Am I saying t
98.
by pdx 10y ago
> When he started chlorine and barrel bombing civilians? I would suggest to you that the world is more complicated than the soundbites vomited to you by the as of lately, largely discredited media and Obama administration. The accusation
99.
by pdx 10y ago
I'm sorry, but I must ask your fingers to become more tired, as your three cases are not the smoking gun of the dreaded racism that you seem to believe they are. The Central Park Five have a lot more people than Donald Trump believing
100.
by pdx 10y ago
> To require defining how racist is racist enough? That word just never ceases to be a source of power and comfort to you, doesn't it? Liberals have used that word too often to shut down debate and dehumanize their opponent or vict
101.
by pdx 10y ago
> Is anyone else troubled by how reactionary we are? People are waking up, and they're angry at the machinizations that have been used to influence and flat out control what we believed to be a free democracy. Personally, I am grati
102.
by pdx 10y ago
Have you not heard that all the other polls oversample democrats by a larger ratio than they put Clinton ahead by? You can actually read the sampling percentages yourself, on most of them. Anyway, I'll just leave this here. http:&#x2F
103.
by pdx 10y ago
Listen fella, I'm not going to do your googling for you. For any others playing, here is another poll from a different date. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/donald-trump-continu... Is it your content
104.
by pdx 10y ago
http://truthfeed.com/trump-surging-with-black-americans-beat...
105.
by pdx 10y ago
They were very silent on the entire email server business. Did they mention it reluctantly a few times? Sure. But they failed to mention a million other things that you probably are ignorant of, if you rely on them for information. They d
106.
by pdx 10y ago
I think I can disprove your premise right here. Of course, as The Center for Public Integrity [1] recently pointed out, "journalists" aren't just making "in-kind" contributions to the Clinton campaign, th
107.
by pdx 10y ago
>racist (again, no more evidence needed, he said it all) You're wrong, and I think you know it. Liberals have used the racist word against anybody who was winning an argument with them for too many years. It ends now. Tr
108.
by pdx 10y ago
Why don't you debate this? http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/politicos-chief-pol... Glenn Thrush, Politco's Chief Political Correspondent, decided to make it crystal clear in the follo
109.
by pdx 10y ago
Your cognitive dissonance is astounding, but perhaps understandable. You recognize and admit (as you have no choice doing, after the mountain of proof) that the media willingly prostitutes itself to further the cause of the current administ
110.
by pdx 10y ago
To further what you're saying. Wikileaks announced for weeks when they were releasing the emails. It was a pre-planned event that the entire world was waiting for. The Trump tape, which had obviously been saved for a rainy day, was tr
111.
by pdx 10y ago
I like your last paragraph. It sounds smart. A really smart lobster in a slowly heating pot might end up saying the same thing, but in his case, he would be wrong. Personally, I think we're being slowly boiled.
112.
by pdx 10y ago
I'm actually talking about Romania, which isn't technically on the border, if we now insist that Ukraine is not Russia affiliated, but still damn close, missile fly time wise. And yes, they are Nukes. They were moved there after
113.
by pdx 10y ago
I did read that. Do you imagine that Breitbart or Drudge Report will be given the 'Fact Check' tag, even if they use that markup? You know they won't, but fake outrage is proven effective, isn't it?
114.
by pdx 10y ago
John Demjanjuk? What the hell does a Nazi guard have to do with Russia? As for your other link. I did look at it. Here's a paragraph talking about Russian Television News. The underlying message is simple: the United States is
115.
by pdx 10y ago
Are you seriously this naive, or are you astroturfing? The corporate media in the west is a lustily willing tool of neocon and neoliberal propaganda itself, no Russians needed. If you have ignored that fact for the last four decades, I won
116.
by pdx 10y ago
It's a trust symbol. You must know that. If Google puts those words in front of an article, it promotes that article as authoritative. They're not saying "Other Opinions", they're saying "Fact Check".
117.
by pdx 10y ago
'Fact Check' articles are often just as biased by what studies they cite, whose projections they choose to use, and what information they supress, as any other article. I would venture to say that the majority of 'Fact Check&
118.
by pdx 10y ago
These are called autoplace and autoroute. They exist, but NONE of the PCB designers I have worked with, all of who have worked at multiple big name tech companies and still do, use these tools. Do the work. Even something as simple at a gu
119.
by pdx 10y ago
> Cytomegalovirus. Most of us carry this virus. It basically takes up the memory of our immune system, but only slowly over time. Perhaps we can eliminate it from our bodies, in a similar manner to what was done to eliminate HIV in this
120.
by pdx 10y ago
> barrage of antisemitic tweets It is convenient to label anything or anybody critical of Israel as being antisemitic. For many years, many western countries blood and treasure have been spilled and spent in propping up that country. Pe

More ›