Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pc86
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
121.
▲
by
pc86
3mo ago
> There used to be "manager's choice" hires where managers had 1 slot in a training program where they could select whoever they wanted. Sometimes that was terrible. Sometimes that person was top of their training program.
122.
▲
by
pc86
3mo ago
Another hindrance to collecting data in the first place is that idiots will read this and downvote it because they think statistics are racist, I guess?
123.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
Why is this the one time someone is expected to disprove a claim rather than the claimant being expected to provide evidence? If you're making the claim you need to provide the evidence. Most people would say that a persistent disparit
124.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
This is one of those things where the first sentence sounds completely fine and reasonable, maybe even objectively good. Of all the things listed "recruitment" doesn't belong to me. Is the argument that it is someone's f
125.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
> > European
126.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
Race and socioeconomic status are pretty strongly correlated but I'd imagine it's possible to do a study to see what the extent of each's influence is. You'd need to find "high socioeconomic" names that are als
127.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
> a rejected resume is more likely to be rejected by every other employer This makes sense to me, albeit intuitively and in a way I can't articulate. > an accepted resume is more likely to be accepted by every other employer but
128.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
If you want to make meaningful change in this avenue you really can't use words like "bias" or "systemic" because anywhere from 49-51% of the population will immediately shut down upon hearing that. Someone can argu
129.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
What climate change have to do with anything?
130.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
Only if you let them.
131.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
My assumption (made admittedly with no evidence whatsoever) that you believe it's possible for someone to verify their age without giving up any anonymity or privacy, even temporarily.
132.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
> there are several reasonable proposals that would be 90%+ successful without stepping on anyone's toes. I have a feeling my definition of having my toes stepped on differs dramatically from yours. > i am convinced that enough p
133.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
By all means don't provide any additional information on what you mean, what book, what it's about, what it has to do with this, or anything else.
134.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
The UK has been worse than the US on privacy and basically any privacy-adjacent right for like 50 years, if not longer.
135.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
It's interesting to say something sounds simplistic when your argument is basically "I feel like __________" and in fact the evidence shows exactly the opposite.
136.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
I asked why "build more" isn't a valid answer and your response is that we need to dethrone capitalism and Reddit-tier nonsense about HOAs? Why is your solution "put 3 families in this single-family home" and not &q
137.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
There is a difference between "forced to pay a fee" and "forced to pay an inflated fee." The GP said it's not about being forced to pay a particular commission, which is the first one, which is accurate.
138.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
> they legally cannot comment on schools or crime Which for probably 70-80% of people, especially young couple with or considering children, are the top two things they care about if not the only two things.
139.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
Yeah even our best realtor, who I actually liked and thought he did a good job (see other comment here) spent probably 1/3 of his total time on our purchase just hanging out or also walking around an open house. Such a waste IMO.
140.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
I've yet to hear anyone say why "build more" isn't a valid answer to lowering the cost of housing. Even if new builds stay at exactly the same price they're at today, the price of older homes will decrease as supply
141.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
If we're talking about home prices why are you talking about apartments? There are a lot of costs associated with apartment buildings that simply don't exist for SFH and MFH builds. Apartments are a different beast.
142.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
The force applies to "inflated," e.g. they agreed to pay a fee but were forced to pay an inflated fee. Not they were forced to pay any fee at all.
143.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
They're intentionally focusing on only one half of the equation because the other half is partly their fault, and addressing it hurts their members. They either don't understand that addressing wages without supply simply increase
144.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
The answer is still build more (which you basically admit yourself in your first sentence). Homes skew larger and more expensive precisely because it's so hard to build them so developers need to make more money from each one. The fixe
145.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
It is "work" in the sense that you can be busy doing things. Nothing is difficult by any reasonable sense of the word. All the realtors I know who are actually successful are constantly busy, constantly taking phone calls or respo
146.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
Did you mean "isn't"? The tone of your comment sounds like you mean to disagree with the quoted point.
147.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
What's your definition of normal? 300 years ago you'd just set up on a chunk of land and build your own house. I'm not saying that's preferable to today but the actual financial cost was comparatively extremely little. I
148.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
To the extent that an organization can understand anything, this one understands economics just enough to argue for policies that will get its members more money, and argue against policies that won't. Real estate is the quintessential
149.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
This is at least 80% of the problem. The system is behaving exactly as you'd expect it to with even an Econ 102-level understanding. New supply isn't being built, or is being severely hamstrung, and more people want the supply and
150.
▲
by
pc86
4mo ago
It's virtue signaling - nonsense from the same people who unironically say things like "lived experience" and "emotional labor." It shows they're part of a particular group, so they're Good, and if you
More ›