pc86

43 ms·

961.
by pc86 2y ago
You're completely right. It's a shame that instead of doing that people were worried about terms like "whitelist."
962.
by pc86 2y ago
Please don't admonish people with a 1-hour old throwaway account, especially if you're not even going to say what you think "this" is.
963.
by pc86 2y ago
So whether you agree with the policy aims or not, wouldn't that mean this is actually productive work while trawling through git histories changing "master" to "main" is just a nonproductive waste of time.
964.
by pc86 2y ago
Even the question assumes that because the answer is "a few billion people die" it's not possible, and because of that (false) assumption, the first thing isn't possible. If China starts sinking US ships half the people
965.
by pc86 2y ago
It's not clear to me in the lines you're quoting that the GP didn't read the article.
966.
by pc86 2y ago
Same for me. I wonder if Claude is better at some languages than others, and o models are better at those weaker languages. There are some devs I know who insist Claude is garbage for coding and o3-* or o4-* are tier 1.
967.
by pc86 2y ago
Cursor does all of this, and agent chats let you describe a new feature or an existing bug and it will search the entire codebase and add relevant code to its context automatically. You can optionally attach files for the context - code fil
968.
by pc86 2y ago
I can't get the prompt because I'm on my work computer but I have about a three-quarter-page instruction set in the settings of cursor, it asks clarifying questions a LOT now, and is pretty liberal with adding in commented pseudo-
969.
by pc86 2y ago
It looks like the big issue with Ann Arbor is supply. I just pulled up Chicago Zillow for this criteria (1-1.25k sqft, 2 bed exact, 1+ bath, condos only, for sale not rent) and am having trouble finding one for more than $700k. Lots in the
970.
by pc86 2y ago
I can't tell if this is a meme or not at this point.
971.
by pc86 2y ago
It's a byproduct of the naïve belief that climate change means it gets hotter (and little/nothing else), to which "just move north" is a logical conclusion. The truth is closer to climate change means more extreme weathe
972.
by pc86 2y ago
I would definitely bring all this up to the new director after they start, but don't frame it as "I got pulled off my other team and I'd rather be there." Instead just frame it as part of the standard 1:1 getting-to-know
973.
by pc86 2y ago
Which is kind of funny since you're talking about UofM, not Stanford or MIT. It's a good school but there are literally hundreds of good schools in the US. In my experience lots of folks educated at top top tier institutions are p
974.
by pc86 2y ago
Don't you think the delta in cost of living between Michigan and NYC/SF is a lot more than $50k/yr?
975.
by pc86 2y ago
Maybe. Lots of companies don't localize their pay, or localize it based on country. Even those that do if you're comparing, for example, Pittsburgh and NYC/SF, you're unlikely to come out ahead in NYC/SF especially
976.
by pc86 2y ago
"Just move north" is a common refrain from people who don't understand what climate change means.
977.
by pc86 2y ago
Whether or not locality-based pay is the norm is an open question. Every place I've ever worked had a budget for the role and that was that, but most places I've worked only hire folks within the US who don't need visa sponso
978.
by pc86 2y ago
What does any of that have to do with the article?
979.
by pc86 2y ago
What does fascism have to do with anything?
980.
by pc86 2y ago
I would expect at least some evolutionary pressure to get rid of unused things in your body. Let's just take the appendix as an example because it's probably the most common "you don't actually need this" thing th
981.
by pc86 2y ago
If you're interpreting Shakespeare you need to know not only the definitions of the words used but the context in which they were used. In the context of the mid/late 18th century, "regulated" typically meant functioning
982.
by pc86 2y ago
Because it is the law, and when you're interpreting the law you can interpret the text in the historical context in which it was written ("the letter") or - when the letter is not 100% clear - what the people who wrote the la
983.
by pc86 2y ago
Formatting strikes again
984.
by pc86 2y ago
> I think we're in the fuck-around-find-out phase of the technology outpacing the societal capacity to cope with it. We absolutely agree on this!
985.
by pc86 2y ago
Just like I can't claim 2A freedom to use a gun and murder someone. You're saying since MGs didn't exist, they shouldn't be covered - or at least presenting that as a valid argument? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
986.
by pc86 2y ago
Puckle guns existed about 60 years before the revolution and you could absolutely own them privately and they were developed by a private citizen, although they're closer to a Gatling gun than a machine gun. If your argument is that ma
987.
by pc86 2y ago
We can hem and haw and guess about what we think the founders would think, or we can look at what they said and what the historical context of firearms ownership is. We don't have private ownership of nuclear arms now and pointing ther
988.
by pc86 2y ago
Took me 10 seconds on Google: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/jun/29/joe-biden/... But the specifics are irrelevant, the spirit is clear. "The Constitution shall never be construed t
989.
by pc86 2y ago
Another huge problem is that law allows union bargaining agreements to dictate what happens to disciplinary records, that officers are allowed to resign when there are investigations happening that effectively kills them, etc. Once an inves
990.
by pc86 2y ago
I'm happy to debate or discuss this in good faith but this isn't a good faith argument. "Arms" meant (means) state-of-the-art, military-level hardware. The muskets that civilians had in their homes were as good or bette

More ›