Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pbhjpbhj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
181.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
It's very easy to find that this statistics is discredited, the figures aren't for "offensive messages on social media" they cover a range of crimes. If the OP is at all interested in the topic, which their comment sugge
182.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
>a "telescope" is not a new creation It was a new concept, combining lenses to look at things far away as if they are close to. The literal atoms/molecules weren't new, but the form they were arranged in was. The purp
183.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Google have also blatantly lied in the past about SEO. My familiarity with the subject is about a decade old, but I don't expect Google to have improved in that regard, quite the contrary. I don't think you can take anything in th
184.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
I don't think that's necessarily true - some large companies are coöps, they don't seem to be sociopathic?
185.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
If Google already slurped up any training data from your site, then not indexing it probably gives them something of a moat over anyone using Google search for site discovery.
186.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Users take part and improve wikis, it's the whole model. If they don't take the adverts, they still can contribute. Googlebot isn't making edits, not even giving signal to the site about what is useful allowing the owners to
187.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
You could use a "OTP" to provide this: give out tokens ("OTP"), anyone with that token can submit, keep a record of the user (eg github username, email address) and token, run a bot to delete submissions that don't
188.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
>and spray-painted planes. You mean, of course, sprayed paint into the turbines of military planes, causing a £million plus in damages. It's certainly not behaviour that a government can allow to continue. Maybe people don't un
189.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
I use (or used to) mdash with spaces, I've always just found the mdash when it collides with the words to be ugly. I've read a few typography related books and checked some style manuals in my time, but no-one has ever 'corre
190.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
So you want a human going 'oh stick a tree anywhere, it doesn't matter' rather than having that done procedurally whether by a simple algorithm or an ML model? It sounds like you might be assuming intent where there is little
191.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
[flagged]
192.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
[flagged]
193.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
You think police should ignore situations in which violence and destruction of property are highly likely? Why? How does that benefit society? At what point do you allow intervention? After they've destroyed £x,000 of property? After p
194.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
You think we should just let sex offenders roam the streets without apprehending them? Or it's only OK if you spent a lot of money to apprehend them, rather than picking people from a camera feed?
195.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Where in the UK are you living, what's dystopian about it?
196.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Did you know people live in the UK? Just to pick on one thing, do you think incitement to murder people by setting fire to hotels, acts that subsequently happened, should just be shrugged at?
197.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Parliamentary sovereignty is a cornerstone of the UK constitution, fwiw. Parliament has been de facto sovereign since the late 1600s. The server is under the woolsack!
198.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
>This was a campaign strategy/promise for the US President. I don't remember seeing "if you elect me I'll destroy NATO, threaten allies, and make sure even USA's oldest allies hate us" as part of the campaig
199.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
GDPR should work to get a copy of the data, also it would only be allowed to be collected with explicit permission -- I'm assuming that data about your car is PII about you.
200.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Care to share any that people here might like to follow?
201.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
Presumably that you'd have to be white as driven snow and have a Confederate-flag carrying Jesus holding an assault rifle tattooed on you to avoid ending up in a detention center awaiting deportation to some foreign hellhole prison.
202.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
I was hoping there would be something funny like twatt.worcs.uk or reading.berks.uk ... That aside, what would you do with such a domain? You could register x.uk with Nominet UK presumably. Just a small matter of the bill.
203.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
"can be" is used to list all possible values, which is where the confusion arises. It sounds like: ∀x, x>C v x<C. "Might be", I think would be better.
204.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
It's a struggle to map a good approach - LLM-based tools are a boon in some respects, like having a personal tutor. But in others are fundamentally opposed to the process of education. Like, I asked ChatGPT to make me some problems, it
205.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
>The establishment and maintenance of these bases cost the tax payers so much.... They supported USA's hegemony, extension of soft powers - essentially (not a quote) 'we trade with USA because they're our partner, they hel
206.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
5mo ago
I'm in a union. My dad has been a union rep (different union), so I know a bit. There is no way my colleagues would go out on strike to protect me if I stole anything. And that's absolutely right. Nor would I expect my union to go
207.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
6mo ago
I was under the mistaken impression you could refuse and then would get a blood test, seems that was wrong/out-dated (also wrong!). The backup test at the station is also usually a breath test apparently. And it seems we have field sob
208.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
6mo ago
Would police unions vote to strike to support a trooper who stole a laptop? If so, then I think you've got police problems, not police unions problems.
209.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
6mo ago
>if you're not paying for something then you are the product. It seems over the last decade that if you _are_ paying, you are still the product, you're just making more money for the people selling you.
210.
▲
by
pbhjpbhj
6mo ago
Google (before the sell-off) promoted a morality in 'don't be evil' that was a stark contrast to other tech firms. The adverts they carried were minimal. Their "free" stuff was top of the line, better than people we
More ›