pbh101

7 ms·

31.
by pbh101 1y ago
Ah, I was referring to loading the same plane from different gates, which I’ve been told exists at some airports (boarding from business/first lounge one floor above the standard gate)
32.
by pbh101 1y ago
There’s probably a classist risk to this (recall the uproar over the residential building in NYC that had separate entrances for different unit classes), let alone the logistics are needed at whole-airport level to support it which is diffi
33.
by pbh101 1y ago
This isn’t my original take but if it results in more power buildout, especially restarting nuclear in the US, that’s an investment that would have staying power.
34.
by pbh101 1y ago
Their healthcare/IT provider like Epic would do it. And in fact some have already done it, from what I can see. Furthermore, preparing/capturing docs is just one type of task specialization and isn’t that crazy: stenographers in c
35.
by pbh101 1y ago
Not OP but listen to podcasts at highly accelerated settings: The information density of ‘two dudes talking’ or any unscripted format is very low, so it time-compresses well. Specific podcasts, typically scripted monologues with technical c
36.
by pbh101 1y ago
The article addresses this.
37.
by pbh101 1y ago
Found this recently and have been loving it! The one that has stuck the most is Keen but Galaxies is a close second.
38.
by pbh101 1y ago
It’s easy to say this in hindsight, though this is the first time I think I’ve seen someone say that about YouTube even though I’ve seen it about Instagram and WhatsApp a lot. The YouTube deal was a lot earlier than Instagram, 2006. Google
39.
by pbh101 1y ago
This is a big moving of the goalposts. The optimists were saying Level 5 would be purchasable everywhere by ~2018. They aren’t purchasable today, just hail-able. And there’s a lot of remote human intervention. And San Francisco doesn’t get
40.
by pbh101 1y ago
Anyone have a comparison to Bazel? They only compare to JVM-centric tools eg Maven, sbt, Gradle.
41.
by pbh101 1y ago
Good point :) the show’s Ever definitely utilizes it but my understanding is the real one does too.
42.
by pbh101 1y ago
Just that: my experience has been roughly the same in an EU country and the US: there was not some magical interface or customer-centric viewpoint the imbued everything by virtue of the EU.
43.
by pbh101 1y ago
Without more context this is silly to say. It isn’t as if we know the natural or correct construction of this market a priori and that 5 is clearly a distortion from that. Consolidation can sound bad in the abstract but in this relatively i
44.
by pbh101 1y ago
Which itself draws from the book ‘Unreasonable Hospitality’ and iirc the Chicago restaurant ‘Ever’ featured in the show applies this approach.
45.
by pbh101 1y ago
This has not been my experience cancelling eu services.
46.
by pbh101 1y ago
Both can be true.
47.
by pbh101 1y ago
Agreed.
48.
by pbh101 1y ago
It is fine if you are just working by yourself on non-prod things and you’re happy with that. But if you are working with others on things that matter, then you’ll find you want your images to have been published from a central, documented
49.
by pbh101 1y ago
This is probably an anti-feature in most contexts.
50.
by pbh101 1y ago
This is generally a bad idea imo. You fundamentally will have a hard time if your api is opaquely network-dependent or not. I suppose, you’ll be ok if you assume there is a network call, but that means your client will need to pay that cost
51.
by pbh101 1y ago
Maybe the friction imposed to mess up the well-factored microservice arch is sufficiently marginally higher than in the monolith that the perception of value in the factoring is higher, whereas the implicit expectation of factoring the mono
52.
by pbh101 1y ago
This is true of any SaaS vendor
53.
by pbh101 1y ago
I don’t think it is at all clear that Windsurf adds zero value. Why do you think this is a helpful analogy?
54.
by pbh101 1y ago
What should individual developers do?
55.
by pbh101 1y ago
Fundamentally and writ large, tech makes us more efficient. Efficient means doing more with less labor. Which is good because it is deflationary: things get cheaper over time from tech advances, and without any tech we would all be subsiste
56.
by pbh101 1y ago
You’re also at the mercy of the libraries you use, no? Which likely makes this an increasingly niche case?
57.
by pbh101 1y ago
If you see someone do it well (the word ‘genteel’ comes to mind) you can find that verbos it and awkwardness will detract from both the directness and honesty. ‘Traditional’ etiquette books are actually pretty good at this stuff: one defini
58.
by pbh101 1y ago
Or it means you haven’t practiced and some parts of the space are more difficult for you to traverse individually but still orthogonal objectively. I would say that something isn’t orthogonal if it is impossible to be both. It is clearly po
59.
by pbh101 1y ago
For me: - the goal - 5 dysfunctions of a team - the first 90 days A friend swears by: - atomic habits - seven habits of highly effective people (Slightly different genre but quite close)
60.
by pbh101 1y ago
Familiar more with the first two and going to suggest there is a distinction between those and the phenomenon originally described in the thread (having read some others too) Reven that being said, there could be value in those ‘repeat’ boo

More ›