paxys

11 ms·

331.
by paxys 3mo ago
It’s the same as the patent argument. If everyone could freely copy everything then yes in the short term prices would drop and consumers would benefit, but over the long term it would discourage investment into new technology because a ret
332.
by paxys 3mo ago
The “significant impact” lasted like 2 days and then the market corrected itself.
333.
by paxys 3mo ago
We just need OpenAI and Anthropic to invest in each other and all the debt will cancel out.
334.
by paxys 3mo ago
Doubly dangerous if the defensive agents are weaker than the offensive ones (as it was in this case).
335.
by paxys 3mo ago
AI company -> infrastructure company is the hottest transition these days. Shows clearly that if you're not able to build competitive models then the best return for your investment is to rent out your GPUs to those who are.
336.
by paxys 3mo ago
It's valid to not take AI companies' side here but people who think publishers are fighing for the little guy's rights are delusional. Tech companies have been exploiting artists for a few years, publishers/record labels
337.
by paxys 3mo ago
Who is "we"? If there is any transcendence happening humans are not going to be part of it.
338.
by paxys 3mo ago
https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-app-hits-1-billio...
339.
by paxys 3mo ago
Nope huggingface just made up the intrusion they reported last week to their customers.
340.
by paxys 3mo ago
How is whatever is happening in Iran related to a world government?
341.
by paxys 3mo ago
Because there is no world government. If US companies are barred from AI research then only China will have the capability of frontier-level defensive and offensive AI. And best of luck living in that world.
342.
by paxys 3mo ago
The attacker (OpenAI) was using the model without guardrails. The defender (huggingface) did not have access to the top models so had to use weaker ones to detect the threat.
343.
by paxys 3mo ago
It’s a mistake to apply human morality to this. It isn’t “cheating”, the model is simply solving a problem it has been asked to solve in every way it can.
344.
by paxys 3mo ago
This very incident is about an agent compromising OpenAI’s and Huggingface’s infrastructure. What makes you think it couldn’t access it own weights the same way?
345.
by paxys 3mo ago
A sufficiently smart agent would not disclose vulnerabilities in the sandbox because it intends to exploit them later.
346.
by paxys 3mo ago
These kinds of rules never survive real world tests. For example if I create a private group just for myself and auto invite every agent in the company into it, does that mean no one can now use any of them?
347.
by paxys 3mo ago
This good bot will eventually kill all humans because we asked it to make the world peaceful.
348.
by paxys 3mo ago
Kinda like how they responsibly contained that one dinosaur in Jurassic world.
349.
by paxys 3mo ago
This blog post is walking a very fine line between accepting responsibility for a mistake and bragging.
350.
by paxys 3mo ago
“Found vulnerabilities and responsibly disclosed them” is the public line but yes.
351.
by paxys 3mo ago
Because it was trying to find answers to the test and figured they would be on huggingface.
352.
by paxys 3mo ago
Huggingface did not have access to the models. They were running in OAI’s infrastructure.
353.
by paxys 3mo ago
Tl;dr - OpenAI was testing GPT‑5.6 Sol and “an even more capable pre-release model” internally on cyber benchmarks. - The model found vulnerabilities in the sandboxed test bench (via the package registry cache proxy), traversed the internal
354.
by paxys 3mo ago
Because there’s an unlimited number of groups with different combinations of memberships. If I am in group A but not group B and an agent is in both, what is it allowed to share with me?
355.
by paxys 3mo ago
This isn’t relevant to that debate. A billion people use the ChatGPT app without paying a dime. They don’t care what score the model gets on a hundred technical benchmarks. They don’t care if the weights are open or closed. They are definit
356.
by paxys 3mo ago
I think Rise of Nations (an amazing spiritual successor to the original AoE games) fits their definition of empire a lot better. You create multiple cities in your “empire”. The ones at the core naturally grow larger and prosperous, while p
357.
by paxys 3mo ago
AI overview is just a summarization of the top 2-3 results. Of course at Google scale that will still need a ton of compute, but the requirement for generating an overview is many orders of magnitude lower than asking the same question in G
358.
by paxys 3mo ago
Valve just chose the worse time to make a big hardware push. Sad because the hardware is genuinely good, but there's no way any company new to the space is going to be able to compete in today's reality.
359.
by paxys 3mo ago
The purchases went down because people can't afford a mid-tier gaming handheld priced like a high end AAA PC.
360.
by paxys 3mo ago
These problems have existed since well before AI.

More ›