pawsed

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   The Frustrating, Maddening, All-Consuming Bitcoin Energy Debate(coindesk.com)

   1 points by pawsed 6y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   Applied Compositional Thinking for Engineers(applied-compositional-thinking.engineering)

   84 points by pawsed 6y ago|32 comments
3. 3.▲
   by pawsed 6y ago

   You are being extremely rude by calling my comment disingenuous, it's your parochial thinking which seeks perfection from an asset from the onset and cannot comprehend that asset classes can mature, if you cannot hold a conversation pr
4. 4.▲
   by pawsed 6y ago

   Not moving any goal posts here, I just meant to say that some part of the energy usage is renewable, and we as mankind have been moving towards more energy consumption each year anyway. In the coming years, we'll start using more renew
5. 5.▲
   by pawsed 6y ago

   This isn't exactly an rebuttal to your argument, but 74% of energy that Bitcoin used to power it's network was renewable energy [1], that's more than you can say for most countries. While the network itself is inefficient, I
6. 6.▲
   by pawsed 6y ago

   Seeing the name of Pedro domingos and how he got cancelled for expressing his views in the recent incident involving Google and timnit gebru, makes me think it's probably related to that.
7. 7.▲
   by pawsed 6y ago

   This is pretty fancy, I looked around and it's straight forward too. Do you think you'll explore the idea of sync viewing and chats so on so forth?