password_reset

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by password_reset 10y ago

   yes. users actively replicate data, not passively. they have inherent control over what they pass on. If a community doesn't want to replicate your data, then go to find one that does.
2. 2.▲
   by password_reset 10y ago

   yes. 1) it would be significantly less secure - compromising either device would compromise both. Imagine an airplane with two engines that needs both to fly - a single engine plane is actually safer - because the chance of loosing one of o
3. 3.▲
   by password_reset 10y ago

   correct, patchwork is the UI, ssb is the database.
4. 4.▲
   by password_reset 10y ago

   you have had the same ideas as we did! this is roughly how secure scuttlebutt works.
5. 5.▲
   by password_reset 10y ago

   absolutely. ssb avoids using DHT for these reasons (and to prove you can build something interesting without using them) also note: DHT: hash table, BlockChain: linked list. but there are a lot more datastructures than that!