parineum

3 ms·

31.
by parineum 18d ago
Inference requires training. That's a disingenuous point. It's similar to people talking about drug companies charging hundreds of dollars for a medication that costs dollars to manufacture. Nevermind that it took them 15 years of
32.
by parineum 18d ago
Young people seem to be surviving just fine in areas where the market value is lower. Sucks to not live in the heart of the city but luckily they have their entire lives ahead of them to accumulate the wealth required.
33.
by parineum 19d ago
Because someone wanted someone else's stuff.
34.
by parineum 19d ago
I always wonder where the people are who continually claim that this whole thing is already profitable are when prices are increased or services cut.
35.
by parineum 19d ago
There is almost always a next big thing. What happens when it ends is people move to the next thing. Practically everything needs some kind of construction, management, software, hardware, etc. I'd be rich if I knew what the next big t
36.
by parineum 19d ago
Murder
37.
by parineum 19d ago
> Consensus is not synonymous with unanimity – though that may be a rule agreed to in a specific decision-making process.[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making
38.
by parineum 19d ago
I thought I was more clear than I was being about rss in the context of the conversation about text based news. How many people consuming text via rss the same way people consume audio via podcasts? We're talking about text here. We al
39.
by parineum 19d ago
I talked to an LLM at burger king the other day until it couldn't figure out that I wanted to change the drink on my previous order.
40.
by parineum 19d ago
> Everything bad stems from lying. That's backwards. Lying stems from bad things.
41.
by parineum 19d ago
I don't disagree and I'm not a mastodon user but, as far as I know, if you local gov hosted an instance and your state gov did too, you could, essentially, join both and see them together? RSS aggregation seems like the solution t
42.
by parineum 19d ago
as much as I dislike when people proselytize mastodon, it seems like a very tidy solution to this problem.
43.
by parineum 19d ago
So what percent of people are required for "consensus" because it seems like 50%+1 to 100%. There seems to also be an implication that democracy is 50+1 when it isn't. It can require any percentage to reach a decision. Those
44.
by parineum 20d ago
That seems like two words for the same thing to me but making the distinction seems like a signalling mechanism to me.
45.
by parineum 20d ago
If the platform is filled with the same category of political speech, it directly flies in the face of the narrative that this type of political speech is being banned and that there's a chilling effect. You're taking a single ane
46.
by parineum 20d ago
When you say "it", what are you referring to? I don't know anything about the internal workings of meta to confidently state that situations like this do or don't cause internal change. What I can say is scores of people
47.
by parineum 20d ago
How do you know it isn't being changed?
48.
by parineum 20d ago
That's part of it but OP presented it as a solved problem but the hardware is expensive/unreliable. That's not the case. I've seen folding robots. They require standardized input, only fold one type of clothing and don&#
49.
by parineum 20d ago
I don't think we can build a robot that takes a pile of crumpled up clothes from the dryer and folds them (reliably without destroying any of them).
50.
by parineum 21d ago
If anyone wanted to do the math, that's an average of 175k per person
51.
by parineum 21d ago
Then just call them both one exploit that allows arbitrary sandbox escape.
52.
by parineum 22d ago
Just like the actual death penalty does, right?
53.
by parineum 23d ago
The problem with that perspective is that people thought, "Only AGI can do X, therefore, if a thing can do X, it's AGI." Because they can't imagine how X could be accomplished without it. However, what's actually ch
54.
by parineum 23d ago
They are instructions. Everything in the context is instructions for the next token. The "thought" guides the answer by providing clearer instructions.
55.
by parineum 23d ago
5% is a lot. I'm not sure where you're getting accurate data from (I couldn't seem to find any that seemed trustworthy) but Anthropic and OpenAI, being the two big players, presumably take ~40% and 5% isn't that much of
56.
by parineum 24d ago
> If the new result is real, more signals should emerge soon. LZ researchers have already collected three times as much data as they used in the paper. It sounds like this implies they've seen 3x more events but it seems like they w
57.
by parineum 24d ago
I do think that the bicycles stick out. They all look remarkably similar, aside from the DeepSeek test.
58.
by parineum 24d ago
I don't really see how replacing the vehicle and the animal is a good test. It'd be better to just have it draw a completely, linguistically, unrelated scene. Like, a single tree in a meadow bending in the wind.
59.
by parineum 25d ago
Do you get paid when people "scrape your stuff"?
60.
by parineum 25d ago
The bottleneck in science isn't ideas or human work speed. The bottleneck is resources and time to get experimental results. LLMs, even in control of lab equipment, address neither of those.

More ›