parineum

5 ms·

61.
by parineum 2mo ago
I had never heard of scratch before but I find this line of thought generally backwards. Maybe that's what carmack is getting at but it seems to me that early "exposure" doesn't really matter as much as people want it to
62.
by parineum 2mo ago
Yes. Next question.
63.
by parineum 2mo ago
The game _is_ "hard mode". There are many, many mountains to climb. Some are harder than others. Each doesn't need to have an escalator so everyone can climb it. Developers have limited time and all features, including access
64.
by parineum 2mo ago
The people doing the work aren't paying for AI, they're getting paid by AI. The people who are having the costs of users not paying "their fair share" (this phrase has officially jumped the shark) are the investors who
65.
by parineum 2mo ago
The implication they are making is that the person _intended_ to destroy potential evidence on the phone. That the person felt there was evidence on it that needed to be destroyed to hide a crime. IMO, even if that's actually illegal,
66.
by parineum 2mo ago
That's not universally true. It will, eventually, produce a comically unrepresentative group and the time it takes for that to happen will depend on the size of the pool of representatives compared to the population. Fifty representati
67.
by parineum 2mo ago
You mean shoving it onto the investors?
68.
by parineum 2mo ago
What is?
69.
by parineum 2mo ago
Destruction of evidence is a crime. They'd have to prove there was evidence.
70.
by parineum 2mo ago
It would be, you're right.
71.
by parineum 2mo ago
I assume they mean natural gas
72.
by parineum 2mo ago
> The system in which those companies exist is explicitly designed though to strip away any humanity or moral qualms as much as possible. Citation needed.
73.
by parineum 2mo ago
> but I think it's generally concerning that people can vote for leaders who effectively can't do anything significant. The people vote for a lot more than just the president. This isn't the president's job. That&#x27
74.
by parineum 2mo ago
It's convenient to blame the "oligarchs" since it justifies you doing nothing since there's nothing you can do.
75.
by parineum 2mo ago
It is. The best products are usually from single minds with a strong vision. "Too many cooks in the kitchen" is a phrase for a reason. Your least favorite products are designed by committee or a vision less person following trends
76.
by parineum 2mo ago
There are hundreds of thousands of CEOs of companies you've never heard of.
77.
by parineum 2mo ago
Polling data isn't some guaranteed right or something. If you ask the Internet questions and then sell the collated answers, it's your job to authenticate the responses or your polls will be wildly wrong and people will stop buyin
78.
by parineum 2mo ago
> I think it's reasonable to expect that models should be able to do the same. This statement seems to imply that the models have a level of intelligence that they haven't demonstrated but are talked about as if they do. Howeve
79.
by parineum 2mo ago
The actual goal of capitalism is the direct the impulses of the capitalist to align with the interests of the public.
80.
by parineum 2mo ago
I'm on board with that. But, again, that's not a Taylor Farms issue, that's a government issue. Personally, I think it's a very good thing to let prisoners work as long as the working conditions are the same standards as
81.
by parineum 2mo ago
The uncomfortable part of that is the involuntary part, not the work. Prison is not voluntary.
82.
by parineum 2mo ago
1) The work is voluntary, calling voluntary work forced labor is a bold faced lie. The people are being imprisoned, which is obviously not a good situation to be in. If doing that work didn't improve their lives in some way, they could
83.
by parineum 2mo ago
The illusion is the Whole Foods shopper thinking that the McDonalds food is crap. Great marketing from the "health food" industry making you think that it's McDonalds making you fat. Raw cane sugar (sold to you at a premium m
84.
by parineum 2mo ago
I'm saying the right wing push and it's attractiveness doesn't come from the top down. Media is a bottom up industry, successful media is the media people want to consume. If right wing media is popular, it's because rig
85.
by parineum 2mo ago
> Now it's a political project to elect the extreme-right in Europe. Certainly the policy of the opposition has nothing to do with the backlash. No definitely not. It's certainly just dumb people being tricked by the bad guys.
86.
by parineum 2mo ago
> Why have we let X (et al) have total control over the content posted by the users ? Because that's not what happened. Why have users given control over their content to X?
87.
by parineum 2mo ago
I'm not sure that matters so much, a toilet can only handle so much traffic. I suspect a wal-mart bathroom sees similar traffic, regardless of location.
88.
by parineum 2mo ago
> EU/US just think that's dumb thing to teach because "eww collectivism" and even the weird conservative people going on about rules usually don't even want that. It's interesting to me to call out conservat
89.
by parineum 2mo ago
Why do you think that is?
90.
by parineum 2mo ago
How big of a boat do you think you need to scoop up some fish? None of those things cost a lot of money and the return on investment for just affording a single bomb pays for itself almost immediately.

More ›