Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
parenthephobia
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
How unlikely is that, though? The question is whether there could be reasonable doubt that, given there is CP on an account, it was put there by the account owner. What we don't know is what proportion of Dropbox accounts that contain
62.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
Yes. Non-recursive CTEs in July 2016, and recursive CTEs in September 2016. https://mariadb.com/kb/en/the-mariadb-library/mariadb-1021-r... https://mariadb.com/kb/en/the-mariadb-libr
63.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
How are miners fees practically different from credit card companies' transaction fees?
64.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
I see no comments on the PR that I'd describe as unpleasant or unkind.
65.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
You can't. You can sell the right to have that domain name point at nameservers of your choosing.
66.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
By turning the "else if" into an "if" you introduce a silent bug when Color.yellow is added, since the final else clause would now have to deal with both blue and yellow correctly. Adding a new member to the Color enum
67.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
I'm genuinely unsure if this is a joke. If you're running that on a modern computer, your server is spending billions of clock cycles starting up. What on Earth is it doing? :) If I write a Go server, I'm unhappy if it take
68.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> If it exits, who cares if the memory of the process is corrupted? People care when memory is corrupted without the process exiting. It is usually better for a program to crash than for it to continue having corrupted its data. The fo
69.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> Anyone can relatively easily become a domain registrar. Relatively easily? It isn't exactly a cheap venture: e.g. $4k+ per year to become an ICANN registrar. I think people shouldn't have to pay that much to exercise their fr
70.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
It wasn't necessary for Google to disprove Damore's arguments, because they didn't fire him over the quality of his science, but rather due to the controversy arising from his claims, whether true or not. It's completely
71.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
The article doesn't say that you can't stay in business using DV certs, so that seems irrelevant. The article says that "Secure" falsely communicates to the average user the sense that it is safe to proceed without cauti
72.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
"the extension of the franchise to women ... [has] rendered the notion of ‘capitalist democracy’ into an oxymoron" Thiel either opposes capitalist democracy, or regrets the franchisement of women. (Edit: Or both.) Reading those wo
73.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> Google is using human judgment If you have proof that humans at Google are actually choosing which sites to reduce the visibility of in search results, that would be big news, and I'd like to know about it. :)
74.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
It's only a fallacy if it isn't true. Is it not true that a supporter of freedom of speech would support other people's freedom to disagree with him without being doxxed by his supporters? It seems to me that it is true, at l
75.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
This isn't censorship, this is HN readers saying they're not so interested in the memo that they need to have another post about it every hour.
76.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
Go permits struct fields to be public. Ergo, Go doesn't care about enforcing the notion that field access violates encapsulation. It is up to the programmer to decide what is being encapsulated.
77.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
I don't think computer games are the likely intended use of Wingnut's technology: I think Peter really wants to use it in film-making, e.g. live preview of compositing and effects. Suppose you attach it to a camera rig, or just
78.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
The nation isn't being held responsible. :) It think it is reasonable to expect an organization to take reasonable steps to ensure the legality of its own operations - such as not ignoring the advice of its own legal experts.
79.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
AMP is a choice. Otherwise, this article wouldn't have been written!
80.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
Is hosting your site on Google Cloud Platform equally disgusting?
81.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
None of those comments are complaining about PHP being slow at repeatedly writing a string whose length is a multiple of the page size to standard output. That is a pretty niche case, and hardly refutes even the complaint that PHP is slow,
82.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> outright control of Parliament Nobody has this! MPs are always free to vote their conscience, and sometimes they do. The Conservatives are not all of one mind about how to conduct Brexit. The aim was not simply to increase the Conserva
83.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
This isn't quite accurate. On such bills there is an additional phase in the process where the English MPs can veto the bill, but they must also be voted through the full parliament.
84.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> There's no way for the stream of consciousness to continue after that point. How can you know that? How can you even know what that means? :) What is a stream of consciousness? Why wouldn't it be replicated along with the phy
85.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> Look at humans. Humanity didn't become a superintelligent whole. But: look at humans. We are each a vast empire of trillions of cells which, for the most part, work together for the survival of the whole, and which certainly posse
86.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> The assumptions behind a superhuman intelligence arising soon are: > ... > 4. Intelligence can be expanded without limit. The only assumption required is that intelligence can be expanded just beyond human limits, which I think
87.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
Without further experimentation the best one can say is that you have a theory which covers that which has already been observed. This is not a useful theory, however: useful theories make predictions about future observations. Really use
88.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
From personal experience, if you're not jumping straight from no emails to a million an hour, your mail setup is good (SPF/DKIM/etc), you're not reusing a IP address that was sending spam last week (so be wary sending fr
89.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> Once we create an algorithm for something it's no longer AI, it's just an algorithm. Yes. If we create an algorithm, what intelligence is involved: real or artificial? Even using neural networks we're a long way from n
90.
▲
by
parenthephobia
9y ago
> few really mean that an 18 year old should have the same income as a 45 year old Surely people don't believe that an 18 year-old shouldn't have the same income as a 45 year-old? A 45 year-old shouldn't have higher inco
More ›