panny

14 ms·

271.
by panny 7mo ago
The Illinois bill is not about 18+ content. It's about controlling who your children can talk to on social media. The OS age check is just a means to that end. The end is blatantly unconstitutional. The bill of rights doesn't ment
272.
by panny 7mo ago
>That is a ridiculous attitude. Spam has ruined email; anti-spam is the attempt to keep it usable. Anti-spam wouldn't be needed in the first place if not for spammers. Spam didn't close port 25 to residential ISP customers. Rep
273.
by panny 7mo ago
>The only legitimate database of emails is "these people have explicitly confirmed to us that we can email them"; any other database is radioactive waste, delete it. That's not actually how HIPAA compliance works. You&#x27
274.
by panny 7mo ago
>Update CAN-SPAM for one-click deletion of email addresses from databases. Then how can I know not to send you another email if I don't have your email flagged in my database to do-not-send?
275.
by panny 7mo ago
The author buried the lede. But fortunately, I just had to select "Steve Jobs’s 10-80-10 Rule" and right click web search it for an AI explanation of the rule. Now I don't need to read whatever the author wanted to force on m
276.
by panny 7mo ago
Porn is obsenity and not covered by free speech. If your kid wants to talk to an adult online, that's not obsenity. That's how kids learn things, from their elders.
277.
by panny 7mo ago
And none of it matters. Netchoice is shooting down legislation as fast as grandstanding legislators propose it. The bill of rights doesn't have an age limit. If a 10 year old can own an AR-15, that same 10 year old definitely has 1A ri
278.
by panny 7mo ago
Only for you in SV. Most of us aren't "$2 million net worth or $206,000/yr annual income for 5 years." I'm glad the fee is lower again, but the fee isn't really what is stopping me from abandoning the US foreve
279.
by panny 7mo ago
>It isn’t a sign of Trump Derangement Syndrome to consider this video obscene. The video is eye rolling cringe, but it definitely is TDS to turn that into an 11 paragraph freak out.
280.
by panny 7mo ago
Both sides are wrong on this actually. Computer generated code has no copyright protection. >The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) and federal courts have consistently ruled that AI-generated works—where the expressive elements are determined
281.
by panny 7mo ago
I tried this out today and it doesn't seem to work for me, because it only considers relative urls to be "internal." If the urls are full urls (https://domain:port/...) then it won't work. It seems like it
282.
by panny 7mo ago
Not reading this since it's paywalled and it appears WSJ figured out how to spot/block archive.today.
283.
by panny 7mo ago
Why would AI generate source code? Why not generate binaries directly if no one will read it? These days, I worry less about my code containing slop, and more about dependencies I use becoming slopped. I worry about AWS, having a great trac
284.
by panny 7mo ago
>I’m not sure why you’re bringing up LLMs at all. Because lawyer types don't seem to understand they need us to write this for them and we can just say no. >If your local law says that your software needs to obey some law, then i
285.
by panny 7mo ago
>We, collectively, only have ourselves to blame, and now it's too late. No, "we" really don't. I wrote software. It's free. You're welcome to use it, or not. Nobody is forcing my software on you. You are not
286.
by panny 7mo ago
>its not forced if it doesn't direct who does the work Good, because I'm not writing it, f\/ck them. Free software, no warranty. Use it if you want to. Otherwise, pound sand.
287.
by panny 7mo ago
>A law compelling providing functionality That's forced labor. I'm not required to write a line of code to please anyone. It's free software with no warranty. They have LLMs, let's see them build it. :)
288.
by panny 8mo ago
The irony is you get an error 451 trying to access this page outside of the US.
289.
by panny 8mo ago
I can't really imagine stopping at a restaurant for a "snack" in the US, everything takes so much time. Even "fast" food is a 10 minute wait at a drive thru. Nevermind the absurd tip culture where the server/ca
290.
by panny 8mo ago
>but there really hasn't been any talk about how additional peripherals like aux would be a no-go. It's water under the bridge. You're NEVER getting a Graphene phone that supports a microsd. It won't happen. The AUX j
291.
by panny 8mo ago
Lol, no, according to graphene, an aux jack is a security problem. So is a microsd. But the hole punch with the camera pointed at your face, that's just fine. When my current phone dies, I'm basically returning to a dumb phone wit
292.
by panny 8mo ago
-can't boot linux No thanks.
293.
by panny 8mo ago
I don't have social media accounts that require personally identifying information. If some place like here starts requiring it, I just won't come back.
294.
by panny 8mo ago
Years of never putting my real name on anything online are starting to pay off. See? Being a paranoid schizo has its benefits.
295.
by panny 8mo ago
archive link https://archive.is/usjGR
296.
mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: spike protein a contributor to cardiac cellular stress(frontiersin.org)
3 points by panny 8mo ago|0 comments
297.
by panny 8mo ago
Can I use freedom.gov to bypass age verification though? :)
298.
by panny 8mo ago
>As Trump slashes science funding, young researchers flee abroad. Without solid innovation, the US could cease to have the largest biomedical ecosystem in the world. Oh no. We might lose the largest most expensive medical system in the w
299.
by panny 8mo ago
>but many tools I use daily are closed source I wonder if this is a major differentiator between AI fans and detractors. I dislike and actively avoid anything closed source. I fully agree with the premise of the submission as well.
300.
by panny 8mo ago
I was acing Andrew Ng's Machine Learning course back in 2013. I think I was excited about "AI" before most people. I came away from that excited about implementing, not using it. Then I watched how nobody had any really fresh

More ›