3 ms·
>We, collectively, only have ourselves to blame, and now it's too late. No, "we" really don't. I wrote software. It's free. You're welcome to use it, or not. N
by panny 7mo ago
>We, collectively, only have ourselves to blame, and now it's too late.
No, "we" really don't. I wrote software. It's free. You're welcome to use it, or not. Nobody is forcing my software on you. You are not allowed to tell me that the software I wrote, for free, and gave to you, for free, needs to have features that I don't care about.
You have an LLM now. I'm obsolete now, right? Do it. Build your nerfed distro, and make it popular. Oh, yeah... there isn't a single solitary disto built by an LLM, is there? Not even one. Wow. I wonder why...
- hananova 7mo agoI’m not sure why you’re bringing up LLMs at all. I’m very anti-AI, so you’re barking up the wrong tree. Either way, your first paragraph is irrelevant. If your local law says that your software needs to obey some law, then it has to, and that’s that. You can whine all you want about privacy and freedom, but the law is the law.
- panny 7mo ago>I’m not sure why you’re bringing up LLMs at all. Because lawyer types don't seem to understand they need us to write this for them and we can just say no. >If your local law says that your software needs to obey some law, then it has to, and that’s that. No, how it works is I continue writing free software and you're welcome to continue not using it. Take me to court with your law, and then be ready to pay legal fees and damages when I win because the law isn't constitutional on multiple grounds.