Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pandoro
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
pandoro
6d ago
I'd go further and say this isn't just a hypothesis, it's the actual nature of reality. Any subjective experience is always mine and now for all observers, for all times. No subject has ever experienced or will experience
2.
▲
by
pandoro
11d ago
The US can and has classified inventions and patents deemed "a risk to national security" under the invention secrecy act [0]. A 1971 leak has shown that [1]: > solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible
3.
▲
by
pandoro
12d ago
Excellent point! Considering the history of these companies definitely makes it clearer how you could reach this point over a few years similar to the boiling frog story. A slow moral decrepitude and moving goalpoasts in the name of "n
4.
▲
by
pandoro
12d ago
I wonder if national security is used as a justification in those circles
5.
▲
by
pandoro
12d ago
That's a perspective I hadn't considered, it might be hubris for sure
6.
▲
by
pandoro
13d ago
I cannot fathom how you can intensely work on a problem that you genuinely believe has a "10 to 25%" probability of causing immense harm or even present an extinction-level risk to humanity. How can you truly believe this and be o
7.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
I understand it as sunlight so bright that your eyes are half-closed, obscuring the landscape
8.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
If you are not familiar with Camus' work, I highly recommend reading the essay collection Nuptials ( Nuptials at Tipasa , The Wind at Djémila , Summer in Algiers and The Desert ). It was written in 1936, when Camus was in his ear
9.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
I use this: https://gist.github.com/KMJ-007/0979814968722051620461ab2aa0... Simple and works great but requires one alias per account
10.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
Depends on your point of view. Has the web been a net positive overall? If your criteria is "instant access to any information" or "catalyze more technological progress" then positive, if your criteria is "young peo
11.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
The general idea is to deliberately shape the geometry of spacetime to allow for effects such as faster-than-light travel (relative to another region of spacetime). Einstein's field equations link geometry to matter and energy: G_μν =
12.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
Could you give an example of the value that only training a model can create but none of the rights-holder could? I feel like if you got a direct, instant communication channel to any of the rights-holder that created the content in the tra
13.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
All frontier models have been trained without any regards for IP protection laws. I don't see how anyone can argue in good faith that distillation is not fair game and does not ultimately "benefit humanity™"
14.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
Exactly. Imagine what would be possible after a billion year of technological evolution, heck even just 100'000 years. We already know that space time metric engineering is theoretically possible within our current understanding of phy
15.
▲
by
pandoro
2mo ago
Neo4j is a great DB but their license price is egregious for enterprise customers. A few years ago I was involved in negotiating a contract for a small/medium size kubernetes deployment (think around 25 cores) and the annual price was
16.
▲
The future of cognitive security and the new sixth battleground
(iai.tv)
3 points
by
pandoro
3mo ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Even more so considering that most, if not all countries already have age-verification infrastructure in-place for selling alcohol and tobacco (and other goods). Why not piggy-back on this? Go to a kiosk/shop selling controlled goods,
18.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Continue building useful models, tooling and products, market them to the people who could benefit and be realistic about their strength and weaknesses. Drop the messaging about job displacement, "transformative/dangerous AI"
19.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
I was not criticizing the technology in itself but the messaging and marketing around it. I agree with most of your points except perhaps the general sentiment outside of tech about AI. Most people I've talked to admire the technology
20.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Bingo!
21.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
I see your point, but in this case we are not talking about disruption at the scale of a product category, vertical, or even an entire industry. AI companies are trying to disrupt entire sectors of the economy at the same time: knowledge wo
22.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Interesting examples, thanks for the nice discussion! I believe it goes deeper than the "logical proof" sense. It's a category mistake. Consciousness can never be "objectified". About the readiness potential I'
23.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Taken verbatim from Anthropic’s Economic Policy Framework ( https://www.anthropic.com/policy-on-the-ai-exponential/epf ): > We are not seeking job displacement. We are working to prevent or minimize it. Some amount of
24.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
Segment starts at 12:46: https://youtu.be/IxqrSXiRja4?si=g59eoE3yzaVn62yX&t=766
25.
▲
IBM and Norway's sovereign fund CEO: Is AI a bubble?
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
pandoro
3mo ago
|
1 comments
26.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
That might be too much of an assumption to make because of the binding problem. Imaging knowing absolutely everything there is to know - measurably, quantifiably, down to atomic/quantum states - about what happens when a human sees red
27.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
You are right that I should have said "That means 0.000003% of humans own 20% of the value globally created" instead of capture . However, getting relatively accurate and meaningful numbers for billionaires income is probably v
28.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
> What she meant was that it's impossible to get that rich without doing something bad — without cheating in some way. > But startups are the most common way to become really rich, and if you want to start a successful startup, t
29.
▲
by
pandoro
3mo ago
You're right that's my mistake, I misread OP's comment
30.
▲
by
pandoro
4mo ago
This public-private drama will only get worse once the AI companies are public and most of the economy depend on their continued performance through their presence in everyone's retirement funds
More ›