pamhalpert

4 ms·

1.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
The problem isn't Red Hat getting them, the problem is a Rocky "customer" would have to just wait for Red Hat to release the patch and then wait for rocky to re-build, and re release.
2.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
Who cares? Every country has skillful, qualified information technology individuals. Additionally, a quick google search shows it looks like RH does offer US only support if a customer is willing to pay. https://www.redhat.com&#x
3.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
So, what Red Hat already offers.... Was Alma and co doing upstream development where they can prove it? Was Oracle patching upstream first or only in oracle linux? Was Rocky offering anything unique, value adding, or were they just copy pas
4.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
i've been a long time lurker, non-commentator, oops. i just do most of my work on cent/rhel/rocky/oracle and i felt comfortable enough to join and comment for once
5.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
I love these strange article topics I wonder how they come up with them.
6.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
ouch!
7.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
>... built on top of software and labour contributed by others. the irony of Rocky, Oracle, and etc just flat out ripping off Red Hat.... which is the exact move that caused this change lol
8.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
Not going to touch the hair on fire tone of this in general... but one thing worth mentioning is I believe the "freeloader" comment meant Rocky, Alma, Oracle and the likes are the freeloaders who are repackaging and RESELLING with
9.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
There's nothing stopping them from using CentOS still? The latest rolling releases are so close to RHEL you'd never notice. Use an older more reliable version locked release that works to your needs and update periodically. these
10.
by pamhalpert 3y ago
the community was dying, the single digit people maintaining it wanted to quit doing it