Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
palmotea
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
421.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> How do most Chinese models handle Tienanmen square or discussions on Han superiority? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/28/we-tried-... https://dev.to/jeramos/deep
422.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> ...when birth rates drop in a country its easy to grow population with entire families including babies from countries that are overpopulated - this is a win for everyone including the environment. Your idea is dumb. The world fertil
423.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> The demands of work have eaten childhood (in zero-sum education races) family life, neighborhoods and social life (people moving all the time for a better job), spiritual life (exhaustion). > Market liberalism has pushed more and mo
424.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
>> I wouldn't call it brilliant. It's like cancer cells celebrating how fast they're growing. > Isn’t that the entire point of a capitalist economy? > What is the alternative? If the point is to be cancer, then th
425.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> This is an interesting topic. If a company does something you approve of (e.g. do journalism) and something else you disapprove of (e.g. make canceling hard), is there a good way to signal both as a consumer? This is also relevant in t
426.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> If your competitors do, you likely will This kind of race-to-the-bottom logic needs to be rejected: by workers, business culture, and the government. Unfortunately business culture embraces races to the bottom (for everyone but owners
427.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> All fair but very much assumes that salaries are rational. Why do we pay some engineers 10x as much for the same role just because they are in a different location? Who's this "we" you're talking about? Are you a so
428.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Sorry but no, you don't get to lie just because your arguments don't resonate with the public. That makes you a bad person. You misunderstand: data centers usually do use a lot of water, and I think the lie is "data ce
429.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Data centers use very little water, right down to none if they want. And state-of-the-art hyperscale data centers really are operated by AIs. There are many, many reasons to oppose datacenters. Not the least is they're there to
430.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> That's the product of math from the point of view of mathematicians. But is it the point of view of those funding math? That's AI in a nutshell: the only point of view that matters is the point of view of people with a lot of
431.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Now, according to Reuters, external, new controls will allow employees to pause the data collection for "up to 30 minutes at a time" as well as request exemptions from the initiative altogether. 30 minutes of opt out should b
432.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Aidenn0 said they're doing their best to accelerate it, and I'm saying "they're" isn't a single monolithic entity and that they're in competition with each other so they're incentivized to go as
433.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Important to note this did not work if your account had 2FA of any kind What about what the op said? > 2FA Doesn't Help > In case you're wondering, because the system treats this high-privilege recovery flow as a total
434.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> It's pretty long and meandering but it's the closest I've seen from AI leadership engaging intellectually with the question you're asking I've heard what these guys say in public on this topic is different (and
435.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> For now, the site remains online, twenty years after Hollywood thought it had seen the last of it. And whoever is in charge today, will likely do everything possible to keep it that way. I'm vaguely aware that other people than th
436.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Isn't there an inconsistency here? You've set up this narrative of businesses as being the only entities with money (wealth?) but then singled out two individuals. You're nitpicking. When an individual is a billionaire,
437.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> I think the parent is speculating that there may be an order of magnitude improvement in the cheap / OSS model space such that one running on a piddling desktop cluster could match or exceed the capabilities of the current SOTA on
438.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
I think to get what you asked you're going to have to directly read their social media and other writings for the last N years and form an impression, keeping in mind self-censorship doesn't mean a change in core beliefs. Followin
439.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> There's definitely going to be cheap or open source models What makes you think your "cheap or open source model" running on your piddling desktop cluster will be able to complete against a SOTA one running in a billion-
440.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Taste and experience are so much more important than the raw talent. You can't fix this with money. Ok, so you've secured a future employment for 10,000 asethetes. Congratulations! Then what about the other 8 billion people?
441.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Sorry that's no realistic. People start businesses, including law firms, all the time with little to no capital. You're clinging past: what you is true when human capital counts for something, but what happens when it doesn
442.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> I think they'd employ some number of humans for entertainment. The key point is: some number . Chances are you and everyone you love won't make the cut. If 10 billionaires control the all the capital of the planet, they coul
443.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> If AI suddenly makes it possible for a law firm to be run with a skeleton crew, then what's stopping all those people you fired from starting new law companies, where AI also does most of the work, and competing with you for the s
444.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
It's pretty obvious: once automation and wealth concentration get so extreme, the economy will get weird and stop being "capitalist" as we understand it. For instance: it'd expect money to become near-meaningless, and th
445.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
>>> I guess if global population drops by 80-90℅ you suddenly get a "sustainable" economy, as everything is repriced the economy of scale needs a much smaller scale. > How many of these top 10% of households will have
446.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
Of course, but if it's managed to make it on to Wikipedia, it's probably the tip of the iceberg. Feel free to make the conclusive and comprehensive survey of their online presence, and report back your findings.
447.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justine_Tunney : > In 2012, Tunney started working for Google as a software engineer.[4] In March 2014, Tunney petitioned the US government on We the People to hold a referendum asking f
448.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> Smoke test though, I can't say I've ever see irl usage. We use it all the time at my employer, and have for decades. They're basic tests to tell you if the app is up or not. Like: you go to this page, and it shows a big
449.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
- The [ utterly mundane thing] was decisive.
450.
▲
by
palmotea
5mo ago
> No, you didn't create it. AI did. You only had a supporting role. You're Ringo Starr and the AI is John Lennon. It's even worse than that: you're the Ringo Starr and the AI is a a "John Lennon" who sucks
More ›