Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
palmetieri2000
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
>As for the second question, the effect holds even when controlling for all sorts of things, like adoptions, location, socioeconomic status, etc. Please post a source for your claim.
32.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Feel free to illuminate us on what this 'message' is, preferably also provide some evidence that supports it's all encompassing nature. Until you do so it is simply a vague allusion that exists only to serve your narrative. I
33.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
>(NOTE: I've been out of Australia for ~20 years and only recently came back, so it's kind of a shock to only get media from the inside) Stupidest thing I've ever heard. There is no 'from the inside' in Australia
34.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I think its interesting that your two examples of 'uninitentional' eradication both have demonstratively been used intentionally to do just that. Smallpox US: https://daily.jstor.org/how-commonly-was-smallpox-used-
35.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Good way to win yourself an assassination.
36.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I love both of these games although I'm not particularly good or knowledgeable about either. Just out of curiosity, do you think there are any interesting resolutions to the issues around the balance of who gets to go first? (First-Mov
37.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
It is strange to believe that my comment must remain accurate in perpetuity. At the time of my writing, the user had two comments in this thread, one about cleaning practices and traditional herbs (that almost no one took issue with). >I
38.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Thanks for explaining! >I appreciated it too - and still do - just perhaps more so before reading some of the others. I think we are on the same page.
39.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Where has this 'pride in their past' narrative come from except for the comment that lists those topics? The comment I appreciated kumarvvr posting makes no proclamations about pride or India or Hinduism, it talks about cleaning
40.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I'm sorry but I don't see how the original comment did any of those things... it doesn't even make mention of any of the topics you have listed.
41.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I've read the other comments and I feel comfortable with my statement. Things I learned from the original comment that I feel extremely comfortable believing: 1. Indian cleaning customs that were prevalent until recently. 2. Two tradi
42.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I learned a lot from your replies to that individual, so thanks for the efforts even if the target recipient doesn't appreciate them.
43.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
> That is, businesses go to them more for stability and predictability than anything else. You really think this is the reason and not the extraordinary removal of income taxes for companies and shares?
44.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Australia has constitutional referendum as well, these require a 'double majority' (from the public) to pass as well as an absolute majority in both House of Parliament. Which means it needs a national majority of voters AND a maj
45.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
I agree with you! My issue isn't with the criticism of the bail conditions or his arrest, both of which are absurd. My issue is the incredibly broad statements about the political situation in Australia. Variations of this became commo
46.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Oh jog on, While I'm hardly impressed with this action from NSW State government, it does not represent Australia as an entirety. Further, while unusual and new, these are bail conditions. I challenge you to find a US state that does
47.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
By what metric are your rights inalienable and innate? Your government permits you to to have those rights through extremely similar mechanisms to ours in Australia. Has the US ever violated one of its citizens 'innate rights'? C
48.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Thanks for engaging and providing more details! I think it is interesting that you so quickly recognise that the Mayor would have an ulterior motive to shift blame and/or responsibility yet seem unwilling to engage in the possibility t
49.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Definitely not bait! (At least, not intentionally, I'm not from the US and the above article is my only context for the problem of store closure relating to theft). I've read your article and it doesn't actually provide evide
50.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
>The victims of shoplifting are other poor people. After all, stores will gladly leave an area and leave other poor people with nowhere to get their goods. Not sure I follow... this would only be true if shoplifting losses exceeded profi
51.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Oh boy. I think its self evident why that is a poor approach to understanding anything other than your own opinion so I wont bother explaining why to you, I don't think you'd care.
52.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Frankly, your (or any individuals) observation is utterly worthless to this discussion unless you can demonstrate some type of relevant expertise.
53.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Well, sure, the other commenter should reference as well, but this is whataboutism. Another commenter not using a source does not exclude you from providing evidence for your claims. Please provide evidence that less than half of caloric i
54.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Sauce, source, sawce, s0rce, I'm out of variations but if you make a claim post a source. The previous commenter has been downvoted for (rightfully) asking for evidence to accompany its claims, you double down on providing no evidence
55.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
>For the overwhelming majority of history, the overwhelming majority of humans have gotten most of their nutrients from plants. If you are going to make a claim about the overwhelming majority of anything it should come with a source.
56.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Another great "Gotcha!" from gdy. You have made no points worth addressing and contributed nothing to the conversation.
57.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Considering your lack of charitability you had for my initial comment why would the person you are replying to interpret you as anything other than nitpicky and asinine? You have added nothing to the conversation. Also in what way would thi
58.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
Feel free to read the responses others have given to my initial post, they cover your complaints quite handily.
59.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
This videogame review from a YouTube channel called Warlockracy is actually also a really interesting perspective on at least some aspects of Russian subcultures and their prominence, I found it a surprisingly insightful social commentary w
60.
▲
by
palmetieri2000
4y ago
This is so cool and a niche I never knew existed, thanks for posting.
More ›