palmetieri2000

11 ms·

61.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Not who you're replying to, but I would imagine its an issue of registry and/or zoning depending on the type of business (and maybe tax stuff too). I'm from Australia so probably pretty different laws, but here at least you
62.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
The research institution or corporation can demonstrate their expenditure of resources used for supporting the academic as they made their discovery. Remember my original comment is within the context of exceptionalism and pride drawn from
63.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
I think the majority of credit should be assigned to you. You clearly acknowledge that your learning is multinational and thus not evidence of the exceptionalism of the specific country your discovery occurred in but evidence of YOUR (and
64.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
No, the 'better' question is why the logic of the US taking credit for an initiative that isn't (entirely or solely) theirs is considered an acceptable norm.
65.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
I watched 98% of the video and really I dont see this as a huge issue, yes it is wrong for the channels to claim in their description that the constructions are done by hand and with less people but given how transparent the cameraman is ab
66.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Do you include economics in this judgement?
67.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Attributing all of this to the US simply because it occurs in the US is wrong and fails to acknowledge the contributions of other countries without which the innovations could not occur. How many top research institutions are staffed from
68.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
>How does a Wikipedia page improve my life and why do I have to dig into it rather than seeing these innovations around me first hand? Might as well read: "why do I need research, evidence or information when I could just take anecd
69.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
> point at and go "this would never have been possible without Chinese innovation"? Well first I linked you a whole wikipedia page full of them. Second, I would never ask that question because it is nonsense and any answer giv
70.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Australia has many flaws, some of them quite significant. Note that I never say a single thing about Australia being perfect or model citizens, that is your fabrication which you interpreted as 'US Bad and Parochial, Australia Good&qu
71.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
I entirely disagree with the perspective that patriotism is necessary for a country to thrive. There may be some argument that it is beneficial but I would like to see evidence of its necessity.
72.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_in_Chin... Feel free to explore that and I'm certain you can dig up plenty more examples of fields in which Chinese scientists have worked on or released signif
73.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
>Yet without great freedom, great innovation like Silicon Valley is impossible Nah, I disagree. First, individuals who were educated across the globe, money from across the globe, and access to global resources are all necessary (and a f
74.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
I agree with you entirely, my point is that in the rest of the world many people would not feel comfortable using that contribution to justify a parochial perspective or ignorance of the rest of the world.
75.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
The logic of "The US is the greatest if you likes X things and bad if you prefer Y" is poor because it can be applied to anything. Colombia during Pablo Escobar's time was probably considered pretty great if you were a Narco
76.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
If you were less obscure about which country that was maybe we could probe into why those deaths happen but you weren't so we cant.
77.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Whataboutism at its finest.
78.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Gun Buybacks were incredibly successful in Australia after the Port Arthur Massacre and now we have f*ck all gun violence. Funny that.
79.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
I constantly argue with people like you, feel free to read some of my other comments to see why you would do precisely nothing to a major armed force and would actually rationalize their targeting of civilians in your make believe Red Dawn
80.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Absolutely incorrect at least in Australia, they are entirely to manage speed in pedestrian areas.
81.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Further, a website that most Australians would consider biased towards motoring enthusiasts and not afraid of dabbling in clickbait-y crap to drive (hehe) traffic to their website (examples below). https://www.drive.com.au/n
82.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
You have a very misunderstood perspective of both the rest of the world and unions. Its okay, just continue take reap the benefits of their efforts while you vociferously argue against them.
83.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
US != the world.
84.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
If you took the time to learn a less nonsensical definition you might have an easier time understanding why OPEC isn't even close.
85.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Yes, the comment you are replying to is complete nonsense.
86.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
How often do people successfully defend themselves from police in violent no-knock raids? My assumption is that it typically goes about as well for them as if the police tried to kill them and they weren't armed, at 'best' th
87.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
The first link in the intro of the ABC article leads you to the paper, which is open access (for me at least). They go into extensive detail of their methodology, but I'll give you a very brief summary that I think might explain why ar
88.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Absolutely, and you should be paid enough to properly take care of yourself while you have those positions.
89.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
Yes, It is the workers fault that they do not get enough funds to properly take care of themselves while working full time. Really dumb take.
90.
by palmetieri2000 4y ago
RE missiles and civilians (Non-US person here with a few questions): I've never really understood why citizens in the US aren't allowed these items, if the fundamental purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to allow the citizenry to figh

More ›