p_noumenon

5 ms·

1.
by p_noumenon 2y ago
The answer seems more to be, "people haven't really been using this magical technology in decades", so maybe they'll start coming up with innovations to it eventually, and find out whether or not near-infrared frequencie
2.
by p_noumenon 2y ago
Any thoughts on whether some frequencies are superior to others for various reasons, or what strengths/weaknesses different frequencies have?
3.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
If overly regular, you're probably having a seizure.
4.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
It doesn't read like that at all; your unfamiliarity with the subject matter doesn't mean it's "pseudoscience and mysticism", that's a classic argument from incredulity. It's rigorously based in the mathem
5.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
These are excerpts from Richard Merrick's book called Interference: A Grand Scientific Musical Theory; highly recommended, available for free online.
6.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
...sounds exactly like waking up from a dream.
7.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
It's still called a particle because that's a useful abstraction, and also keep in mind that correctly identifying it as resonance happened much later than people first started to use said abstraction. In reality, we know by now t
8.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
And thank god for equal temperament, because the last thing you want is perfect intervals that don't leave any space for proper resonance. «In general, the interference equation can be used to measure resonant amplitudes for any musica
9.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
Consciousness is literally the only thing which can't be an illusion, because it's through consciousness that illusions are perceived in the first place. Cogito ergo sum; you can doubt what you are experiencing as much as you like
10.
by p_noumenon 5y ago
What you just described sounds exactly like waking up from a dream.