p_j_w

46 ms·

751.
by p_j_w 5y ago
They don't need to own it to EEE it.
752.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Will nobody rid us of a corrupt collusion between government and corporation? We could by changing who we vote for.
753.
by p_j_w 5y ago
I'm of a similar opinion. If they want to prove that they heart Linux, that's what they're going to have to do. Or, at the very least, document everything (including DX) so that the Wine devs can do their thing even if MS don
754.
by p_j_w 5y ago
Sure, but there's a significant subset of attackers for whom this isn't an option. For example, I live in the USA. Torturing me because the government thinks there's a 7th key I'm not being up front about isn't an o
755.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>I would much rather Why not both? Is one mutually exclusive of the other?
756.
by p_j_w 5y ago
Percentages are all that really matter here.
757.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Just millions of years of evolution and deterministic neurochemistry. That sounds an awful lot like a human being.
758.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Make a useful feature difficult to discover, then remove it when few people discover it. How many people do you really think would ever need this feature in day to day use, even if it were extremely easy to find? The number is probably
759.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Clearly, if the price of making progress in the field is to engage in all this ugly mathematics and -eww- engineering, then it's no price worth paying. What makes you think the author is saying anything like this?
760.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Which isn't a problem. If once vaccinated the virus is mostly harmless, then it is just one more of the many endemic diseases we live with without worrying about. It's a problem if you're one of the many people who, for w
761.
by p_j_w 5y ago
You've made it abundantly clear here that you don't know what you're talking about, so you perhaps should just stop talking at all on the matter. >Because vaccinated people can still spread infections vaccinations, just li
762.
by p_j_w 5y ago
Apple banned the channel, I'd be surprised if they actually wanted the sort of info you're suggesting they might be after. At the very least, it suggests Apple doesn't think there's much benefit in having that info. What
763.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>the original motivation behind the journal which was to enable a platform for researchers being suppressed and cancelled by woke academia for daring to shine a light in areas they've declared off limit. You need to check your histo
764.
by p_j_w 5y ago
No. The applications here were vastly different.
765.
by p_j_w 5y ago
It's been discussed. From the article: "In 2016, in response to an ARRL petition for rulemaking, the FCC proposed to remove the symbol rate limitations, which it tentatively concluded had become unnecessary due to advances in modu
766.
by p_j_w 5y ago
If one of the biggest upsides to crypto is that it can be used as an end-run around authoritarian regimes, then a policy proposal that doesn't hurt this while curtailing some of the bigger downsides gets some points in its favor.
767.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>It's incredible what drive manufacturers are getting away with. I think it's more incredible that we continue to elect governments that let them get away with it.
768.
by p_j_w 5y ago
It's not any easier to be sympathetic to the point when the first victim in the article is someone who owns a vacation home that largely sits idle in a city with a housing shortage and problems of homelessness. Not that it's not a
769.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>a few expensive years of research and they can get back into it. I haven't kept up much in the last couple of years, but back when I did, I was under the impression that AMD couldn't actually afford to do this. I know their co
770.
by p_j_w 5y ago
That is a point in favor of this particular policy idea, though, isn't it?
771.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>This allows mining farms to be located adjacent to hydro dams or wind farms to get the cheapest energy and use energy that would otherwise be lost in transmission. Sure, but there doesn't seem to be to be any indication that this i
772.
by p_j_w 5y ago
Surely a company choosing not to publish certain material falls under the umbrella of their free speech rights? Or are we all for compelled speech now? If someone has a podcast that Spotify carries and then say they think the Holocaust was
773.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>I will say I think he looks for folks that he jives with more than most qualified for the subject. Then how can you honestly believe he's just looking for the best ideas?
774.
by p_j_w 5y ago
I think most people know that an Echo is going to be sending data back to Amazon, and for people who know this and are fine with it, there's nothing wrong with having an article about the device that doesn't beat that dead horse.
775.
by p_j_w 5y ago
This would be handy, but at the same time, I think I like that not doing so encourages people to click the link and read more of the article than they might otherwise.
776.
by p_j_w 5y ago
EdgeRouter 4 is available on their own store right now. Most of it's lighter weight siblings aren't, but their 3 most expensive models are also out of stock. None of their consumer wifi gear seems out of stock, though. I'd gu
777.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>What makes even less sense is wanting use to use software like vSphere or ESXi since its about 10x more complicated than just using virt-manager/QEMU. I always just assumed it was as a learning experience. When I was in my 20s, I d
778.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>that’s a very different comparison to something like going to a private business Governments regulate comings and goings of people to and from private businesses all the time. We don't allow people under 21 to go to bars or people
779.
by p_j_w 5y ago
>Honda does not give me an SDK and API to run arbitrary software on the computers in my Civic either. If something goes haywire in my phone, it can't possibly turn into a 2 ton death machine, which is something that can happen with
780.
by p_j_w 5y ago
It's my car, I should be allowed to choose to drive it drunk.

More ›