p-ranav

5 ms·

1.
Show HN: Fccf – Quickly search through C/C++ source code in a directory(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 4y ago|0 comments
2.
Show HN: Repr for C++: Return a printable string representation of a value(github.com)
3 points by p-ranav 6y ago|0 comments
3.
Show HN: Table Maker for Modern C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 6y ago|0 comments
4.
Show HN: Awesome-hpp – A curated list of header-only C++ libraries(github.com)
3 points by p-ranav 6y ago|0 comments
5.
Show HN: Structopt for C++ – Parse command line arguments by defining a struct(github.com)
85 points by p-ranav 6y ago|56 comments
6.
Show HN: Envy – Deserialize env. variables into type-safe structs in modern C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 6y ago|0 comments
7.
Show HN: Tabulate – Table Maker for Modern C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 7y ago|0 comments
8.
Show HN: Indicators – Activity Indicators for Modern C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 7y ago|0 comments
9.
Show HN: Jsonlint – A lightweight command-line tool for validating JSON(github.com)
4 points by p-ranav 7y ago|0 comments
10.
Show HN: CSV for Modern C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 7y ago|0 comments
11.
Show HN: Preprocessor macro that implements Python-style 'with' statement in C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 8y ago|0 comments
12.
Show HN: Yet Another Argument Parser for C++(github.com)
1 points by p-ranav 8y ago|0 comments
13.
by p-ranav 8y ago
Hello. If boost is already part of your workflow, there is probably no reason to switch. boost::program_options is sophisticated and widely used by the community. If boost is not part of your workflow and you want something lightweight, the
14.
Argument Parser for Modern C++(github.com)
2 points by p-ranav 8y ago|2 comments
15.
by p-ranav 8y ago
Start slowly. Don't think about spending four years of ALL your free time on this project. Think short term. 3-6 months and see where you get. Plan what you want to finish in 3-6 months and see if you are able to find the passion to fi
16.
by p-ranav 8y ago
Did you mean to link to a URL?
17.
by p-ranav 8y ago
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I agree. This is not optimal. The project was more a learning experience for me with language interpretation. I have since learned that it is better to implement a byte-code emitter and a stack-based VM. I just
18.
Show HN: Walnut – A tree-walking Interpreter in C++(github.com)
3 points by p-ranav 8y ago|2 comments
19.
Show HN: Lightweight Lexer with UTF-8 support in C++(github.com)
2 points by p-ranav 8y ago|0 comments