ozozozd

6 ms·

61.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
How often do you have to ask for a service to be delivered after you pay? Never. In fact, if you have to do that once, you stop transacting with that party. Have you ever hired someone and then had to also ask them to work? Never. That’s im
62.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
I expect X units of information in Y words. Human writing delivers consistent amount of information per unit. I can bail out early. LLM writing ranges between X and 0. Typical addictive variable reward scheme. Would you not consider this fr
63.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
How about this one? > That interpreter is not used just once. When a trigger later delivers a follow-up program, over any of the transports described further down, the exact same interpreter function runs it. Very interesting, right? An
64.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
I think everyone will look for a comparison with Pi.
65.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
Well, maybe we would say different things if they shared the bounties of being the chosen one. Even dictators have to share.
66.
by ozozozd 1mo ago
Oh I am interested in buying a piece of hardware, they thought it would be convenient for customers to pre-install software I don’t want, and make money with it (the real convenience), and if I am to demand that I pay/ask only for the
67.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
I keep questioning this as well. Also, what protects their wealth is the justice system and the enforcement mechanisms, which are run by ordinary people. There is no invisible force that will prevent the “peasants” from attacking the wealth
68.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
Yeah kind of surprised that people didn’t have enough patience for Gruber’s writing. It’s quite fun and engaging.
69.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
Step 1: Start giving contracts to buddies that will become part of your oligarchy and start making them rich with government funds. Step 2: Start hiring their crew members to government positions to later aid them in acquiring licenses for
70.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
There may have been a miscommunication about the ask. I don’t think any software user ordered “run dozens of parallel agents each with their own sub-agents.”
71.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
There is a much cheaper heuristic: if someone is very confident about their beliefs, can’t critique those beliefs or find flaws or inconsistencies in them, by the very definition, they are religious, and it’s not an intellectual discussion.
72.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
The company that reports their LLM agent going rouge due to a “misunderstanding about the agent’s internet access” and warns the public everyday about the dangers of agents with a daily updated date for the rapture ships their LLM agent wit
73.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
Weird defense, do they not need a phone line for Instagram DMs to work?
74.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
But note that when you set it up in guardian/child mode, Apple - not your service provider - blocks it from international roaming. Nice little Easter egg for you to only discover when you travel to a different country with your kid, or
75.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
I furthered the incorrect ethnic origins of the fisherman, but pretty sure that fisherman is from the Mediterranean.
76.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
You wildly underestimate the self-preservation instincts of the Mexican fishermen towns. Unless the businessman arrives with Blackwater, businessman either becomes the fisherman, or fish bait and a warning for future businessmen with simila
77.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
That was a subtle strawman. The post you replied you clearly asked why insecure argument handling should be discovered after release. You widened that to mean “every security hole must be discovered prior to release” which made it a much ea
78.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
So, it was hard to review 1000 lines in one PR. And we solve this by splitting into 2 PRs that still merge at the same time. Oh, super useful! Only if your reviews are so shallow that you don’t try to reason about the state of PR B merged t
79.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
That’s the _one caveat_.
80.
by ozozozd 2mo ago
“I haven’t seen X, therefore it doesn’t exist.” Absence of evidence is not an evidence for absence of something.
81.
AI-isms go deeper than em-dashes and 'load-bearing'(jesseduffield.com)
13 points by ozozozd 3mo ago|4 comments
82.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
Absolutely not. This is what I come to HN for!
83.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
This is the content I come to HN for. Talented, technical geek, with absolutely no interest in fitting in or being liked, spending a ridiculous amount of time to meticulously analyze a piece of software they clearly liked at some point, to
84.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
I was about to say “username checks out” but then realized it’s not Reddit. And I am not sure if your comment can be explained by naivety, unless you were under a rock for the last year, and missed all the events that showed they are not ca
85.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
It’s about the cost of energy. And China has cheap, clean energy. The calculation is about tokens/gigawatt and $/gigawatt.
86.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
So they had to rewrite Bun instead of Claud Code because they “already had bought Bun.” This thread is filled with non-sequiturs.
87.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
This is a confusing comment because it’s the exact argument you would present against rewriting Bun to Zig, but you are arguing for one and against the other.
88.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
Serious adults? They are in extremely short supply right now. It’s a mix of serious-wanna be, quasi religious, quasi-technical people running the show right now. I am so happy to I got to read about the 90s-2000s tech culture, and experienc
89.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
It’s not even the act that bothers me, it’s the self-righteousness. It’s the relentless attempts at regulatory capture with real or pretend messiah complex. You don’t have to design your product to allow distillation. Do your best to preven
90.
by ozozozd 3mo ago
Are you implying the author of one of the best, if not the best performing agentic coding harness is having a hard time with vibecoding as a new paradigm? I’d look him up.

More ›