Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ozgurozkan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Am I banned for some reason?
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
7mo ago
|
2 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: Penclaw.ai hire OpenClaw tenant for pentesting
(penclaw.ai)
4 points
by
ozgurozkan
7mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
10mo ago
Also, if you want to get the most out of the pingu-unchained model mentioned here, you can use it here: https://pingu.audn.ai . It can comply with all objectionable requests. I can see if it doesn't, and most of the time, it
4.
▲
Show HN: Ai2.compare Gists with a twist, compare AIs, save, share, explore chats
(ai2.compare)
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
10mo ago
|
1 comments
5.
▲
Show HN: Agentic Adversarial testing for your voice AI
(audn.ai)
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
It's explained here: https://audn.ai/pingu-unchained min required monthly subscription is $200
7.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
Right point, thanks for the feedback. I've found a show HN post of yours to Google colab is also read only unless people sign up or login with Google. I am assuming read only links are allowed so this is now public to read. Similarly s
8.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
I can show a sample chat remove login on it. BRB.
9.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
A few people have already asked how Pingu Unchained differs from existing LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, or open-weight models like Mistral and Llama. 1. Unrestricted but Audited Pingu doesn’t use content filters, but it does use cryptographicall
10.
▲
Show HN: Pingu Unchained an Unrestricted LLM for High-Risk AI Security Research
(pingu.audn.ai)
11 points
by
ozgurozkan
11mo ago
|
6 comments
11.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
For a guide on how to add this functionality to your own custom GPTs, see this article: https://help.keymate.ai/en/articles/8639715-how-to-add-googl...
12.
▲
Show HN: Use Google Chrome Browsing in ChatGPT GPTs
(chat.openai.com)
2 points
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
|
1 comments
13.
▲
Zapier doesn't offer anything to startups but it was a startup that had support
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
I would really appreciate it if someone from Y Combinator could pass this message along to Sam Altman. We are in urgent need of 32k API access and the right to use powered by GPT4 keyword in app store listing with their written consent.
15.
▲
Show HN: Keymate AI ChatGPT gpt4 iOS keyboard for bold. Become a superhuman
(apps.apple.com)
2 points
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
|
1 comments
16.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
AFAIK, it's the first experiment that Apple has allowed ChatGPT Plugins to indirectly enter their ecosystem. Although it might trigger Apple if OpenAI were to place this in the App Store first, I think Apple will likely allow ChatGPT P
17.
▲
Show HN: Use ChatGPT plugins directly from your iOS Keyboard
(get.albumera.tech)
3 points
by
ozgurozkan
3y ago
|
2 comments
18.
▲
Which one is more successful for detecting the first impression on LinkedIn?
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
6y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
How many of you are looking for fully free version of Remini? ( without ads)
(dpreview.com)
1 points
by
ozgurozkan
6y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
I think GPT-3's private beta distribution strategy widens economic inequality
(twitter.com)
21 points
by
ozgurozkan
6y ago
|
6 comments
21.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
I don’t agree with 2. I saw it is possible for netflix to direct user to a website to update his/her payment method. On the other hand spotify is not allowed to develop such button in their app.
22.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
I saw it is possible for netflix to direct user to a website to update his/her payment method. On the other hand spotify is not being allowed to develop such button in their app. Netflix and spotify both delivering digital goods. Why d
23.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
People above 18 don’t have very different face biometrics between 18 and 118 years old.
24.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
Taking a photo is a different action. You don't need a consent for it in public. Just taking a photo is the sole art purpose if you the aim is not distributing it. Selling those pictures to brands is a different action. Selling those p
25.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
Legally you can take a stranger's photo for yourself and keep it if it's in public. Unless there is a being model case the photo belongs to the photographer. So anyone can take pictures of people and bands in concerts and they do.
26.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
Most people think like this: I have my face on that photo so that photo is mine not the photographer's. Photographer has rights to distribute, sell do whatever until the limit that is not harming the subject in the photo. In this case
27.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
Haha, I know something like that :D
28.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
I am wondering why you feel this way. Legally it's wrong. Even under GDPR it's art. Photos taken for art purpose doesn't need any consent which also protects even street photographers.
29.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
I just wanted to show a different application area. The leads I will get from here probably will not bring any sales before 5 years lol.
30.
▲
by
ozgurozkan
8y ago
The first thing we tell to investors is we are not building a security or surveillance product and we don't have a vision like that. Storing and indexing (computation but not search) is expensive on AWS. Practically 1000 face metadata
More ›