ozankabak

4 ms·

1.
Ask HN: Does ChatGPT plugins use prompt chaining or a toolformer-like approach?
2 points by ozankabak 4y ago|1 comments
2.
by ozankabak 4y ago
We bank with Mercury and I couldn't get a hold of them in business hours after receiving this email at 5:30PM CET on a Friday (unsurprisingly). This email seems odd to me, Mercury shows a transaction posted as of March 9 for employee p
3.
by ozankabak 5y ago
Does the set of validators really need to be static (or fixed-size)? I may be missing something obvious, but it seems like we can also support a dynamic set. Consider the following scheme: - In addition to transaction data, each validator s
4.
by ozankabak 5y ago
Thank you!
5.
by ozankabak 5y ago
Where can I find more information about the "Succinct counting blocked Bloom filter"? Can you point to an implementation or a document? Thanks.
6.
by ozankabak 5y ago
I was thinking about the signature issue as well. In flat space (i.e. Minkowski metric), this would imply a constant four-potential with an imaginary 0'th component, which I can not make sense of.
7.
by ozankabak 5y ago
IIUC the authors are saying that if we associate the metric with the four-potential via an outer product, they get a picture coherent with the current understanding of how electromagnetism "works" in GR under certain circumstances
8.
by ozankabak 6y ago
So if we have a theory expressive enough to make statements about ordinary (Peano) arithmetic, we can always form a self-referential statement within the framework of this theory which we can not prove or disprove. So far, so good. Here is
9.
by ozankabak 6y ago
You are talking about Sprecher's modification to the original Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem, right? This version, and its implications, have been a lingering wondering for me for quite a while. Are you aware of any research on 3-layer netw
10.
by ozankabak 6y ago
No, but s/he might tell you that it is safe to count on God being an important concept to many people for the foreseeable future. In the same vein, gold will likely be perceived as a good store of value for the foreseeable future, whic
11.
by ozankabak 6y ago
Clear, concise and to the point. Looking forward to reading the rest. If you finish the whole series and fix/improve the posts in this sequence using the feedback from here, I think it might serve as one of the go-to pages for technica
12.
by ozankabak 9y ago
I don't understand if they use windowing as a fixed computational step that is active both in training and scoring time, or, if they use sliding windows only to chop up the training data. Also, I wonder if they checked how a feed-forwa
13.
by ozankabak 12y ago
Your "invisible frogs" would not be a reformulation of Newtonian Mechanics (NM). A reformulation needs to make the exact same predictions as the original theory. There are many reformulations of both NM and GR, and they are quite
14.
by ozankabak 13y ago
Yes. I don't know the exact dynamics of their toy problem, but thinking about it this way can help: When the rod falls over, it will stay there from then on. In terms of the number of possible future states, there are less possibilities for