Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
owenversteeg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
173 ms
·
1531.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
It's solid advice, as it's very easy to lose money writing transactions manually.
1532.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
When I said that Min was near feature parity with Bootstrap, I was referring to the percent of use cases covered (which, in my mind, is the more important metric.) Min covers the vast majority of use cases that I've seen Bootstrap used
1533.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Hmm. I'll add a better main/examples page for v2, and some parts are going to be spruced up. The icons have to be unicode due to size restrictions, unfortunately. I don't see an issue with the padding/margins for the but
1534.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Regarding jQuery, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it required for dropdowns and responsive navbars? Regarding Min, I'm wondering what you think looks 2004-ish about it. If it's the buttons, those are in for a change; p
1535.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Min has dropdowns and all of Bootstrap's navbar options. You'll just have to use the navbar plugin (owenversteeg/min-navbar-plugin) Progress bars, pagination, and button groups are all coming for Min 2 or Min 2.5, although de
1536.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
1. Min has dropdowns and all of Bootstrap's navbar options. Progress bars, pagination, and button groups are all coming for Min 2 or Min 2.5, although demand for them is very low. 2. Nope, Bootstrap requires jQuery. This is the exact e
1537.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Answer: You wouldn't. Bootstrap's extremely bloated, requires jQuery, and has a huge (required) JS file. Choose a small, leaner CSS framework, like Min - only 995 bytes and it is near feature parity with Bootstrap. http:/&#x
1538.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Personally, I don't like Bootstrap. It's difficult to modify, requires jQuery and its own massive JS file, and is huge. Compare that to Min, the extremely small (995 bytes) CSS framework. It has a Bootstrap to Min converter, has n
1539.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Min, the extremely small (995 bytes) CSS framework. It has a Bootstrap to Min converter, has near-feature parity with Bootstrap, and is very easy to use. http://minfwk.com
1540.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I made GoalCalendar, a website that tracks your goals on a calendar visually, and I use it every day. http://goalcalendar.com I also created the Min CSS framework, an extremely tiny (995 bytes) CSS framework, which I use in all
1541.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I guess it's not working then :) By the way - it looks really nice. I'd use it if I weren't on Arch Linux.
1542.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I think the sense of community that’s there is the main reason for Dogecoin's popularity. In the Bitcoin community, scams are rampant and those that are scammed never get their money back. In the Dogecoin community, there is exactly th
1543.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
It's clearly a satirical post. I'm sure that if he was publishing a nonsatirical article he would also not have implied that correlation is causation.
1544.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Personally I try to make the code work by the end of the day as kind of a motivational thing. (Like you described above.) Also, to be pedantic, I think it would actually be a mild kind of OCPD.
1545.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Every time I read about Mongo I think of http://mongodb-is-web-scale.com That said, if your project doesn't store extremely important data and needs to be quick to write Mongo's an OK choice. Of course, even though it&
1546.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I personally think that I don't need to spend $222 on something that seems to be minimally useful. I don't need to monitor how often I brush my teeth, how often I drink coffee, how often I water the plants, and how often I take me
1547.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
My CSS library uses bacteria names as release names, like Bored Bryocella and Alcoholic Aquifex. http://minfwk.com
1548.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
As I said here ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7032169 ) it's usually because of front-end performance. Users are very concerned with performance, and loading a 150kb library doesn't help. The extra kilobytes
1549.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
It seems that a large motivation to not use JS frameworks is their large size. Of course, the same can be said for CSS - the frameworks are quite large. Unfortunately, since most developers don't interact with CSS as much, people typic
1550.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I copied it to a pastebin: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6992850
1551.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
The website was down for me at first but after 27 refreshes I managed to get it. Here's a mirror: http://pastebin.com/avMpRwrU
1552.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Ooh yay! My CSS framework Min is the smallest of them all! http://minfwk.com
1553.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Why would they give you old PDFs? :) Jokes aside, I had no idea that OReilly gave PDFs with their books. I thought that was only something that much smaller publishers did.
1554.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
Awesome. I love small things. In fact, I created a CSS library, min, that's 995 bytes - http://minfwk.com/ .
1555.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I can't vouch for previous versions, but OneNote 2013's OCR is absolutely fantastic. It blows anything else I've tried out of the water.
1556.
▲
by
owenversteeg
13y ago
I've been a contributor to Wikipedia for a few years. I mostly do small corrections but occasionally make an article or vastly improve an article. My most significant wiki-creation is my Peltier element diagram (which explains how to r