owen4d

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Yeah, definitely. My bad. It's definitely not idiomatic. I think was trying to avoid using the anonymous fn syntax, as I thought that was be more off-putting, and partial hadn't occurred to me at the time. In the end, I think I ju
2. 2.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Thanks. Re: Enterprise, I've seen a presentation about some of the work going on at Walmart. Would be great to hear more 'stories from the trenches' from larger scale developments. It would really help sell the language. Re:
3. 3.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Yeah, that footnote could have been more helpful! I've replied to a comment on the post with my thoughts on books. Hope that helps.
4. 4.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Clojure Koans, is similar to 4clojure, and also worth a look> http://clojurekoans.com/ Bookwise, I thought the following were pretty good: 'Clojure in Action' by Amit Rathore and 'Clojure Programming'
5. 5.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Ha, yeah, maybe. I guess what I meant is this, say you have some OO/Scala-like code like this: mydata.doA(blah).doB().doC(blah2).etc() You can read it left-to-right: I've got some data, I do something to it, I then do something el
6. 6.▲
   by owen4d 11y ago

   Ha, yeah, I get where you're coming from. And I toyed with putting a threading macro example inline, and in the end put a footnote in instead. My reasoning was that basically, regardless of the threading macros, you are going to have t