owebmaster

6 ms·

91.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
I'm risking having less "humanity/empathy" than ChatGPT 4o now but that's a socializing problem of the people feeling that way. Models are calculators, not therapists/friends.
92.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
> Agreed, for a public demo like this one, GitHub Pages would work great If you are okay with it being down regularly Edit: Ironically, that would be the case now: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/hcbtzksccj2f
93.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
It's funny that you chose the exactly model that has a huge fanbase asking for it to be added back. ChatGPT 4o got a lot of people addicted. https://mashable.com/article/chatgpt-gpt-4o-ai-retirement-pr...
94.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
> This isn't the end of programming, it's the beginning of your broccoli haired nephews ability to program Which is funny because that was the case 25+ years ago. We (the nephews) would create websites using PHP. It was common
95.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
> Your body is very efficient as self regulating Yet the mind of most people is terrible at that, we love to overeat our body regulations.
96.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
I'd bet not even the vibecoders that prompted it know. But Claude said it's production ready
97.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
You should care more about your message than how people react to it if you believe in what you are saying.
98.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
> The other side has a bunch of criminals that sometimes succeed in rape and the most famous of whom is now dead rather than confess Isn't the best friend of the dead one the most famous now?
99.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
It looks like AI psychosis
100.
by owebmaster 1mo ago
> would cost multiple engineers, one of which would cost much more than $48k/year. Have you played the game? There's no way all this wasted money is comparable to the work of multiple engineers. This is using AI for entertainme
101.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
Chinese tanks costs 5x less than Italian ones. Same GDP, different amounts of real assets. In the past people would use the quality excuse but that's not the case anymore, the Chinese ones are probably better.
102.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
Not sure if I got his comment wrong or you but he said that smashing their AI looms would be the wrong move and we (the one that I'm part of but OP isn't) should hope for the tech elites to be kind enough this time to share. We sh
103.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> We're going to smash the looms rather than figure out how to share them, again. Not we. They. Maybe you are part of that group too but "we" certainly don't.
104.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> Until that time, it's general purpose software and is mostly useful and mostly benign. Sure. Now pair it with corporations that fully control over government institutions.
105.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> "Everyone hates us but they can't have enough of us. Our revenue can't stop rising" Anthropic is far from profitable so using Claude makes them lose money. There's a fictional scenario where they make this mone
106.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
It haven't changed. It's all about discipline: with eating and moving your body. There's no alternative to that so the best way is to keep trying until you figure out what works for you.
107.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
They only difference is your judgement. The person taking lame photos want to turn that into an interesting hobby too.
108.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
It seems you can't accept the idea that different people enjoy different things. You aren't happier than the people that have more fun taking pictures, pretty much the opposite. They were living their moment and you were bitterly
109.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> Not wrong, but GDP is a rough metric of economic and industrial capacity. So if Italy wanted to, it could convert its economy to produce tanks and missiles at a similar rate as Russia is doing. Italy can make more expensive tanks that
110.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> The fact that some country has cheap potato or consumer electricity rates doesn't mean a worker can buy more iphones or macbooks with their salary. Same can be said about paying 100x more on prescription drugs and counting that as
111.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
There's a big chance these companies won't last long
112.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> I generally ship 40 hours in three with AI. You ship 3 hours in three with AI. The old number is meaningless now.
113.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
There is a theory that the verbosity and comments help getting better results with the current benchmarks. So the models are theoretically getting better but in practice they are getting worse.
114.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
This calc is off. Using Claude for a few hours with the $20 plan will hit the limit for a week while the local model can process things 24/7.
115.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> The US economy has outperformed every economy on earth for the last fifteen years In nominal dollars, not production/output
116.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
Which can both be optimized if the person is smart enough. The feedback loop even helps with learning. We spend 24h/day in our own body and interacting with people.
117.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
When someone tells me they are smart in person the first thing I check is how healthy/fit they are and their social capabilities. Most nerds aren't smart.
118.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
Is it a interview question to the MBAs cutting costs at all cost?
119.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
> Internet echo chambers are quite a problem. AI success and its immense implications are wreaking havoc on the ability of even intellectuals in HN and lobsters to face reality in front of them, even as their predictions become falsified
120.
by owebmaster 2mo ago
He probably thinks his vibecoded things are in some genius level

More ›