otterley

25 ms·

631.
by otterley 6mo ago
At one point, Google disabled io_uring on its production servers ( https://security.googleblog.com/2023/06/learnings-from-kctf-... ) - I don't know whether this is still true, though. Perhaps a Google can confi
632.
by otterley 6mo ago
> For me, these arguments feels like that you are trying to allow people do to whatever the want for the money as long as they can hide behind the company. If the law allows it, why not? If a company is doing things you don't like,
633.
by otterley 6mo ago
Why would anyone "feel uncomfortable opening their door, walking down the street" if they weren't being harassed? It sounds to me like you're trying to defend harassment. If that's not true, and you also believe peo
634.
by otterley 6mo ago
"The only real solution is to aggressively name and shame the engineers who build this tech. They should feel uncomfortable opening their door, walking down the street." What do you think this is a call for, if not harassment?
635.
by otterley 6mo ago
These are private actors. It's not acceptable to harass people for building things that are lawful but that you don't like. If you don't like this functionality, participate in democracy and work with your representatives to
636.
by otterley 6mo ago
Southwest was famously killing it during the oil shocks of the 1990s and 2000s because they had the foresight to buy futures when spot prices were low. See https://southwest50.com/our-stories/the-southwest-jet-fuel-h.
637.
by otterley 6mo ago
It doesn’t work that way. Canceling flights has significant business-impacting downstream effects that go beyond mitigating the loss caused by a bad bet.
638.
by otterley 6mo ago
That logic would also extend to individual stocks, wouldn’t it?
639.
by otterley 6mo ago
S3 Files is not POSIX compliant and doesn’t claim to be so. For example, atomic renames aren’t supported.
640.
by otterley 6mo ago
Do you have comparative benchmarks on the filter performance? I'm particularly interested in the SQLite FTS case.
641.
by otterley 6mo ago
My mistake, thank you for the correction.
642.
by otterley 6mo ago
Mise is number 64, not number 10. Please verify your facts before posting in the future. https://formulae.brew.sh/analytics/install/30d/ (That said, your observation is well taken.)
643.
by otterley 6mo ago
It doesn't matter how "naive" you think a question is. Nobody here deserves sarcastic remarks in response to a good-faith question. Literally the first guideline under "In Comments" is: > Be kind. *Don't be
644.
by otterley 6mo ago
The FCC doesn't enforce antitrust law. That's the FTC. (The FTC is also the commission that Lina Khan chaired for a while.)
645.
by otterley 6mo ago
What does the FCC have to do with this?
646.
by otterley 6mo ago
As a lawyer trained in trademark law, I've never heard this. Do you have any references?
647.
by otterley 6mo ago
Use of the English language can often lead to ambiguity. In the case of "Windows subsystem for Linux", it can be reasonably read that "for Linux" means that the functionality applies to Linux, i.e., to provide it with a
648.
by otterley 6mo ago
Ah. I didn’t intend to excuse the decisions of upper management when I said that. My intent was to counter the notion that a corporation and its workers can’t be analyzed independently. A corporation is just a business formation, and busine
649.
by otterley 6mo ago
You’re redirecting. You made the claim that this is happening; it’s your burden to back it up.
650.
by otterley 6mo ago
Can you support this claim with some evidence? Not just about the redundancies, but I’m also particularly interested in hard data showing Claude is capable of doing that kind of research with near 100% verifiable accuracy and migrations wit
651.
by otterley 6mo ago
How hard are you looking? "I haven't seen arguments" doesn't mean much if you're not looking for them. You might as well have had a blindfold on. It's as meaningful as saying "I haven't seen arguments
652.
by otterley 6mo ago
I'm shocked-- shocked --that a company with the integrity and upright moral character of Polymarket would have their registered agent located in Panama. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers#Illegal_activiti.
653.
by otterley 6mo ago
You haven't heard their definition yet.
654.
by otterley 6mo ago
I'm not exactly sure what you're getting at with this question. It seems to still conflate corporate-level decisions with boots-on-the-ground work. Are you suggesting that whatever decisions their upper-level management makes that
655.
by otterley 6mo ago
That’s not in dispute. The question is whether we should be supportive of the company’s efforts to improve reliability, or whether we should keep punching down. How would you feel if you were in a similar situation and outsiders breathlessl
656.
by otterley 6mo ago
It’s ok to disagree. Disagreement isn’t verboten here. In fact, I’ve been reading the book Unsettled by Stephen E. Koonin which calls into question the consensus on climate change and the author makes some great points.
657.
by otterley 6mo ago
Discussing climate change has never been banned; this sort of claim is easily disproved by even the most cursory of searches in the box below. Try it. Here, I’ll say it right now: climate change is real, it has deleterious effects on our wo
658.
by otterley 6mo ago
Tell us how.
659.
by otterley 6mo ago
Really? Only two possibilities?
660.
by otterley 6mo ago
Who is “maintain[ing] the service”? The workers, of course!

More ›