ottah

6 ms·

91.
by ottah 8mo ago
It's not sufficient, especially if I am not learning about the problem by being part of the implementation process. The models are still very weak reasoners, writing code faster doesn't accelerate my understanding of the code the
92.
by ottah 8mo ago
Honestly my job is to ensure code quality and to protect the customer. I love working with claude code, it makes my life easier, but in no way would a team of agents improve code quality or speed up development. I would spend far too much t
93.
by ottah 8mo ago
I absolutely cannot trust Claude code to independently work on large tasks. Maybe other people work on software that's not significantly complex, but for me to maintain code quality I need to guide more of the design process. Teams of
94.
by ottah 8mo ago
> Where IDEs are headed and why specs matter more than code. We are very far away from this being a settled or agreed upon statement and I really struggle to understand how one vendor making a tool is indicative of an industry practice.
95.
by ottah 8mo ago
Agreed. Government should receive its mandate through consent and if people don't want to make these choices, it's not the privilege of experts to enforce their preferences without out that concent. The state should only inform.
96.
by ottah 8mo ago
Most code was garbage before AI, and most engineers made significant mistakes. Very little code is not future tech debt. Review and testing has always been the only defense, reputation or skill of the committer is not.
97.
by ottah 8mo ago
I doubt anyone is going to really use it for that purpose. What's more likely is people nitpicking or harassing pr authors over any use of AI.
98.
by ottah 8mo ago
Why!? What possible benefit is there to stuffing my git commit history with this noise?
99.
by ottah 8mo ago
I'd think you'd just get a lot of bots agreeing with you.
100.
by ottah 8mo ago
Only if you write a custom prompt with information you don't want to disclose.
101.
by ottah 8mo ago
Never accept the bullshit false dichotomy of people pushing an agenda. There are many, many ways to solve this issue other than the nuclear option of a ban and doing nothing.
102.
by ottah 9mo ago
It's trivial for the state to punish you and nearly impossible to assert your own rights. It is a very hard legal battle to get those rights acknowledged and upheld by the courts.
103.
by ottah 9mo ago
Rubut will write you letter https://shop.elephantrobotics.com/collections/ultraarm/produ...
104.
by ottah 9mo ago
Seems reasonable to assume some blame from the pentesters, but neither are police known to be faithful and honest presenters of the truth. I'm not firmly convinced that the police story isn't exaggerated or embellished.
105.
by ottah 9mo ago
Only older people are deserving of equal protection, because they reliably vote. Young people get screwed over for everything else.
106.
by ottah 9mo ago
TikTok scared the elite class in ways we're not understanding. This isn't about protecting children, it's about indoctrination. You learn a santized version of the world in school and they keep you from an uncensored view of
107.
by ottah 9mo ago
We grew up with 24 hour cable news. Same thing, different medium. Remember how they manipulated us into believing in weapons of mass destruction? They would have done it with the genocide in Gaza, if it wasn't for the ability of people
108.
by ottah 9mo ago
No our algorithmic manipulation was done through corporate media. Same monsters, different medium. It was the church, then newspapers, cable news, and now social media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consen
109.
by ottah 9mo ago
You are definitely remembering the past with rose tented glasses, because it very much was not as wholesome and safe as your describing.
110.
by ottah 9mo ago
Yeah, but should the state really be this deeply involved in the personal choices of it's constituency? We don't stick our hands into similar activities such as religion, political affiliation, or dietary habits. Sure you can make
111.
by ottah 9mo ago
I hate this. An explanation is only meaningful if it comes with accountability, knowing why I was denied does me no good if I have no avenue for effective recourse outside of a lawsuit.
112.
by ottah 9mo ago
This should also be illegal in the US.
113.
by ottah 9mo ago
> Today's agents are better than the median human code reviewer at catching issues Not my experience > A human rubber-stamping code being validated by a super intelligent machine What? I dunno how they define intelligence, but LL
114.
by ottah 9mo ago
Unfortunately sometimes it's more of a title than a job description. Company's define the job, and call it what ever they feel like.
115.
by ottah 9mo ago
The models are not smarter than us by far. Have you not run into issues with reasoning and comprehension with them? They get confused, they miss big details, build complicated code thats ineffective. They don't work well at tasks that
116.
by ottah 9mo ago
I don't think people really adhere to Google's definition; most companies don't even have nearly similar scale. Most SRE I've seen are running from one Pagerduty alert to the next and not really doing much of a deep dive
117.
by ottah 9mo ago
I dunno, I don't think in practice SRE or DevOPs are even really different from the people we used to call sys admins (former sysadmin myself). I think the future of mediocre companies is SRE chasing after LLM fires, but I think a comp
118.
by ottah 9mo ago
So if we're talking about the extraordinary power of the state to enforce a right, it has to be in the interest of the public. What is the desirable state we're getting at? Are we maximizing the published creative works, are we co
119.
by ottah 9mo ago
This is literally been the entire purpose of all drone regulations. Hobby aircraft have never been a legitimate public safety issue, but they are an issue for the state's ability to hide. There is and will always be a public interest i
120.
by ottah 9mo ago
I believe that no, copyright does not encourage the creation of creative works, because the mechanism of an exclusive economic monopoly on a creative work supresses more expression than it encourages. Copyright may have hade more validity w

More ›