orra

8 ms·

91.
by orra 2y ago
> That's another company that feels like they don't want to be an OSS company after all TBH that's nothing new for Cockroach. Even back when they were open core, the core was so restricted it didn't include backup &am
92.
by orra 2y ago
The fair thing to do would be to bring proceedings against him the New Zealand. Extraditing him to the U.S. isn't accountability: it's a flex.
93.
by orra 2y ago
> Note that Apple and Google made a big deal about how they are extending their upgrade timelines, without mentioning that they actually have to This is unsurprising, but deceptive and borderline illegal. “Presenting rights given to cons
94.
by orra 2y ago
Is the terminology slightly off? AIUI TypeScript has type unions. But this looks like a discriminated union which I'd recognise from F# or Haskell. The distinction I'd draw is that for a DU there are named case constructors. Yes?
95.
by orra 2y ago
Cool that you open sourced this. As you say there's nothing open quite like this. Not using MJML as a design decision. Foes that simplify deployment a lot, or just keep things lighter? In turn, do you have to strangle a lot of compatib
96.
by orra 2y ago
Ramification implies adverse unwarranted complexity. There are no ramifications, just a few straightforward requirements.
97.
by orra 2y ago
You're not really describing that much effort in the scheme of things: make a filing and notify several parties. Annual accounts are a far bigger burden, and they have to be done.
98.
by orra 2y ago
A domain rewrite permanent redirect is pretty straightforward.
99.
by orra 2y ago
I appreciate your suggestion of the recursive acronym, ASF Software Foundation.
100.
by orra 2y ago
It's cheaper to change the name and logo in one go, than to change the logo; then later change the name and logo. I cannot agree they want to change the name, otherwise they would be.
101.
by orra 2y ago
There's no legal ramification of changing their name. Companies change their names every so often; it doesn't erase their legal rights or obligations. Technical? Not sure what huge problems they are, but as a Software Foundation y
102.
by orra 2y ago
> And yes, IANAL. Politely, you're presumably not a lawyer of European law. > Then, in paragraph 38 [. . .] In paragraph 39 They're called Recitals, and I'm not sure why you're so focused on them. Recitals help cla
103.
by orra 2y ago
Required for who? It's fine that you need it. But I think you overestimate the number of people who simultaneously go to pool parties, jump in with their jacket on, and don't have accidental damage insurance.
104.
by orra 2y ago
True, although it's unusual to see it for copyright not patents. That said, the far bigger issue is the end of the same clause 2.1: > NVIDIA may update this Agreement to comply with legal and regulatory requirements at any time and
105.
by orra 2y ago
Often there's a long click menu in your SMS app to do it. But all that really does is copy the body into a new SMS. There's no metadata to indicate it's forwarded, as you suspect. This means texting 7726 is a two step process
106.
by orra 2y ago
> If artificial sound has a big impact we should have legislation around it ASAP, no? The EU (and UK) have required this from late 2020, IIRC. However it only applies to new cars. I don't think there's a requirement to retrofit
107.
by orra 2y ago
Interesting! However the company which runs the official gazetteer has advice, and the reasoning is nonsense: >GeoPlace does not advise that councils include or remove punctuation in official naming or on the street name plate. Street na
108.
by orra 2y ago
Observables are painful, especially when they should just be available Promises. But Signals? That's just what everybody is converging on, hence making Angular no worse and no better than the competition in that regard.
109.
by orra 2y ago
No, I don't think they do non-targetted advertising. Also this case was about the fake engineered consent for targeted advertising.
110.
by orra 2y ago
Non targeted advertising, limited targeted advertising underpinned by genuine consent, paid features. All of these are lawful business models.
111.
by orra 2y ago
I retract the claim of proprietary. I misunderstood some of the licence wording. The license appears to be well accepted as a permissive open source license. https://spdx.org/licenses/AML.html
112.
by orra 2y ago
I presume they're releasing it because they traibed it using the just-announced CoreNet library. However, the model is proprietary. I'm tired of the open washing.
113.
by orra 2y ago
Mixture of Experts. A popular example is Mixtral.
114.
by orra 2y ago
> Nor is it great for the yet-to-mature craft that high salaries invited a very large pool of primarly-compensation-motivated people who end up diluting the ability for primarily-craft-motivated people to find and coordinate with each ot
115.
by orra 2y ago
Sure, in theory. But if you move so fast that you already are running the base 8x22B model from last week, you can easily fix this. I've long thought that if you want reproducibility and reliability, you need to pin your deps. So, IMO,
116.
by orra 2y ago
> Mistral just released the most powerful open weight model in the history of humanity. Well, yeah, it's very welcome, but 'history of humanity' is hyperbole given ChatGPT isn't even two years old. > How did they w
117.
by orra 2y ago
Is this release a pleasant surprise? Mistral weakened their commitment to open source when they partnered with Microsoft. It's nice they're using some of the money from their commercial and proprietary models, to improve the state
118.
by orra 2y ago
Just to add to this answer, here's [1] how to do .NET with AOT compilation, without needing Blazor. [1] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/use-net-7-from-any-jav... Such an app needs to download a megabyte of r
119.
by orra 3y ago
> and one of those copies can end up with uninitialized junk, so that's wrong. To be fair to the Debian patch, reading from uninitialized junk doesn't sprinkle randomness into the desired buffer: it invokes undefined behaviour.
120.
by orra 3y ago
At the time, it felt like Debian got a lot of flack for the bug, but there's the collaboration attempt you mention above. Plus, the upstream OpenSSL code was invoking undefined behaviour. Hence the compiler could have validly made the

More ›