orra

40 ms·

511.
by orra 4y ago
Yikes, that seems pretty horrendous law. In the the UK the tax exempt status comes from the fact you're locking away the income for, say, decades; and you'll be liable to normal income tax at the point of withdrawal. It's des
512.
by orra 4y ago
lol, that's a brave approach. Although with my pedant hat on: that's extrapolation, not interpolation. That's because 128 is outside of the existing range.
513.
by orra 4y ago
I don't think end users win, in either scenario. The article says > The intended benefit is to provide a DNS resolution service that is able to comply with the various content regulations in the EU by blocking the resolution of cer
514.
by orra 4y ago
The traditional reason was probably distributed caching, to reduce the load on authorative servers. Having an ISP or open resolver near you with cached results alsoo means less latency, when you first look up a domain.
515.
by orra 4y ago
Thanks for this thoughtout reply. Automapping can also be used for renaming, and simple type conversions. But yes, structural typing and other interesting typesystems can make this first class. I didn't realise serious work had been pu
516.
by orra 4y ago
Thanks, that's reassuring.
517.
by orra 4y ago
> That means the cost of your system will be approximately double to run what the manufacturers specifications claim. Wait, seriously? That's (a) disappointing, because I thought heat pumps were pretty great. And (b) you're abs
518.
by orra 4y ago
I've used Automapper a few times, in Enterprise software which takes separate layers to a dogmatic extreme. Automapper always felt like a code smell: if the layers are so trivially mappable, should they really be different layers? Alte
519.
by orra 4y ago
Those are pretty compelling advantages. Thanks for sharing.
520.
by orra 4y ago
Even leaving aside the word <on>, it's problematic that, syntactically, <true> and <foobar> look the same but are treated differently.
521.
by orra 4y ago
Can't believe you've been downvoted. HN isn't homogonous, but too often has apologists for immoral and illegal behaviour, provided it's done by a technology company.
522.
by orra 4y ago
There's no point. RAIL are well aware their licenses are proprietary (see their FAQ), and they are happy with that.
523.
by orra 4y ago
I am not an expert, but I'd just use the the normal LGPL/GPL/AGPL licenses for the models.
524.
by orra 4y ago
No, the GNU licences place copyleft obligations on distribution/conveyance. But they allow you to run the programs for any purpose, without field of endeavour restrictions, or moral police. You don't even need to accept a licence
525.
by orra 4y ago
> Changing a company name is an expensive proposition Companies regularly rebrand. A brand depreciates, just like equipment, and so is regularly updated.
526.
by orra 4y ago
Eh, companies and organisations regularly rebrand, even if it doesn't always require a name change.
527.
by orra 4y ago
> Office + ChatGPT is coming, as in...integrated. Mmm! Perhaps finally delivering on the dream Clippy aspired to.
528.
by orra 4y ago
Stable Diffusion's code and model weights can be downloaded, but it's proprietary, not Open Source.
529.
by orra 4y ago
They sometimes provide code, and less often pre-computed models. But we're not talking about their crown jewels, so the name OpenAI is completely misleading.
530.
by orra 4y ago
Ah, that's cool. Thanks for the correction. I was misremembering the Unladen Swallow retrospective[1]. It's fair to say they used a lot fo their available time contributing to LLVM, but it sounds like that was feature work, not bu
531.
by orra 4y ago
Quite. Unladen Swallow was unfortunately a failure, in part because LLVM at the time was quite buggy, and in part because LLVM wasn't (isn't?) magic enough to speed up a dynamic language. The blog post here mentions they do their
532.
by orra 4y ago
Depends on your use case, but for me, absolutely not. The btrfs manual says RAID5 “should not be used in production, only for evaluation or testing. The power failure safety for metadata with RAID56 is not 100%.”
533.
by orra 4y ago
Plus, almost every other use of that field is a word, not a letter. The other poster's innocent abbreviation excuse doesn't pass muster.
534.
by orra 4y ago
Reading that thead, https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/103upr6/co... says the user could have been banned for racism. We're not talking subtle stuff, either.
535.
by orra 4y ago
No, because AIUI, header only libraries don't really have an ABI. They get compiled into the application, as opposed to building a separate library that you linked against.
536.
by orra 4y ago
Yeah, you're right. That's undefined behaviour, which is a compiler free for all in terms of unwanted effects. I think this is unique to CLib, not from GLib.
537.
by orra 4y ago
Ah, there's a repo. That's cool: I didn't realise you'd open sourced this.
538.
by orra 4y ago
> company that wants to make money (for example through GPT-3 API calls). Right. > Historically, OpenAI has also been concerned that their SOTA models could be threatening to the world if released. That was clearly marketing spin. Jus
539.
by orra 4y ago
I quite like MuPDF. For ages its UI was small but dated; it looks less dated now. That said, I don't remember there being a save button...
540.
by orra 4y ago
The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (Directive 2005/29/EC). Article 7(4)(c).

More ›