I don't think end users win, in either scenario. The article says > The intended benefit is to provide a DNS resolution service that is able to comply with th

I don't think end users win, in either scenario. The article says > The intended benefit is to provide a DNS resolution service that is able to comply with the various content regulations in the EU by blocking the resolution of certain DNS names. I like GDPR enforcement, but I presume this just means copyright police. Yay!