originldirgibl

4 ms·

1.
by originldirgibl 6y ago
Re: tax avoidance vs tax evasion: https://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/whys/thm01/les03... I definitely understand the point you're making, but terminology is important in regards to legality
2.
by originldirgibl 6y ago
Or Tesla could design their processes in a way that doesn't violate OSHA rules... I don't understand why changing a production floor often would inherently lead to more violations. I could see an organizational bias towards speed
3.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Yet Volkswagen is doing it: https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/17/business/volkswagen-plants-eu... . I don't think "it would be complex" is a reasonable excuse.
4.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Is everybody conversely entitled to live in low density areas?
5.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Texas also has no income tax.
6.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-crash-missiles-expla... The Iranian military would undoubtedly have known which missile systems would have been deployed in the area as well as the launch and impact characterist
7.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
It didn't. I assume it took them three days to decide whether or not they could establish plausible deniability. Then the cell phone video of the second missile hitting the plane came out. It's easy to own up to mistakes when your
8.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
https://www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-expla... In Europe they have had pedestrian crash testing since 2010. The US does not currently have a standard that I'm aware of. Though because a good
9.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Genuinely curious, why is this flagged?
10.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Look at the last few threads on this topic, you'll see the same pattern.
11.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
This feels like an overly broad and disingenuous interpretation of the word shilling. He provided an alternative view, bolstered with facts (and yes, went overboard with Nazism comparisons).
12.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
There has been plenty of proof. See my other comments. There has not been any proof that they don't exist. If you're making a positive claim you need to add sources. Otherwise you're getting into a celestial teapot argument.
13.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
One, you should provide citations for the numbers specified in your claims, otherwise they are an ad absurdum argument. And two, maybe the number did increase? It's been reported by multiple sources in multiple countries, and been addr
14.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Even if the population follows that distribution it doesn't mean the comments follow a homogonous reflection of the dominant opinion of the population. I apologize if the apologism comment went too far. It is my perception in reading H
15.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
Why is concentration camps in quotes, since this fits the literal definition of a concentration camp?
16.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
I don't know this guy specifically, but it's been reported by other sources. This is a real thing that's happening. I find the general Chinese apologism on this site strange. Even if it were 13k why would it not be an issue t
17.
by originldirgibl 7y ago
As opposed to the silly 75% decrease in Bitcoin from December 2017. So deflationary.