orf

18 ms·

301.
by orf 2y ago
No, it seems like an oversight in the code sample. It should be wrapped in Ok()
302.
by orf 2y ago
Oh no, gradually increasing heat in online privacy-focused tech discussions! An adtech companies worst nightmare! How will they survive :(
303.
by orf 2y ago
Cool? Is that supposed to be a downside?
304.
by orf 2y ago
> The point I put forward is what I and a small select section of the market wants as features Or > “Because the population of people that would actually use that functionality rounds to approximately 0." > How can you say tha
305.
by orf 2y ago
You asked: > How can you say that, where are your figures/stats/evidence? I responded with: > just look outside in the real world? That’s totally relevant to you asking why no mass-market phones support increasingly niche fe
306.
by orf 2y ago
I doubt it can be, unless your data is too small to matter or you’re doing something wrong.
307.
by orf 2y ago
No, obviously not.
308.
by orf 2y ago
Even untuned, for every single workload I’ve tried I see more than 2x improvement in speed. Usually 5x to 10x
309.
by orf 2y ago
> For starters I'm 1 person, so the market is not O. And I know of others, and I know I'm not alone Of all the people you interacted with in any way, shape or form this year, what percentage of those would benefit from this? It
310.
by orf 2y ago
With great power comes great responsibility, and the responsibility to maintain what started out as “a few lines of groovy” is not one I’d ever take up again. There’s a middle ground between overly flexible and very constrained, and I think
311.
by orf 2y ago
> I disagree that GitHub Actions is much more powerful than GitLab It is, by leagues. Even something simple like running a step before clone/checkout is impossible with Gitlab CI, let alone any of the actual powerful stuff.
312.
by orf 2y ago
> the airlines just added 30 or so minutes to their flight schedules, so most of the times they land early - wahey, progress That is progress, given the advertised flight times more accurately represent the p95 time as opposed to a hopef
313.
by orf 2y ago
That iteration loop is pure madness.
314.
by orf 2y ago
Both of your answers are positive numbers, so at least you can both agree there is a line.
315.
by orf 2y ago
Sooo… just as safe then?
316.
Accelerating data discovery with S3 Metadata(docs.aws.amazon.com)
3 points by orf 2y ago|0 comments
317.
Amazon S3 Metadata (Preview) – Easiest and fastest way to manage your metadata(aws.amazon.com)
2 points by orf 2y ago|0 comments
318.
by orf 2y ago
Assigning semver versions to deployments makes about as much sense as your replies. Which is why nobody does it. You don’t get it, seemingly by choice at this point. Good luck with that.
319.
by orf 2y ago
> The date is not informative. It’s not supposed to be informative . It’s not supposed to be parsed. It’s a version identifier . The date is much better than a commit hash or an opaque number for this. Using semver for an external API
320.
by orf 2y ago
It’s ok, I’ll do it for you - What is the version number of GitHub.com? = I don’t know - Do you think the deployment version is an appropriate format to convey compatibility in a system of that size and complexity? = I do not - Do you think
321.
by orf 2y ago
> That's pretty much the definition of tokenized Oh boy. It’s rare to see such confidence mixed with such nonsense.
322.
by orf 2y ago
Nobody calls them “translators”, that’s so silly. It’s a compiler, or transpiler (still a compiler). Avoid using appeals to authority when discussing, it doesn’t make you look good. Even more-so when your authority is relatively mundane an
323.
by orf 2y ago
I’m wondering what your answers are though, because you’ve done nothing but try and avoid answering.
324.
by orf 2y ago
I’ll ask again because you’re just not getting it: - What is the version number of GitHub.com? - Do you think the deployment version is an appropriate format to convey compatibility in a system of that size and complexity? - Do you think it
325.
by orf 2y ago
> If you apply this TrunkVer scheme to a library, continuously deployed or not, the result is a disaster. Cool, except those are not systems or an applications are they? > A "deployment system" that you need to integrate wit
326.
by orf 2y ago
> unless there is exactly one consumer of the product that is always running trunk and all their data is continuously migrated to the newest version Bingo
327.
by orf 2y ago
I really don’t get what your obsession is with compatibility and package managers. Stop and actually read what people are telling you before replying. Repeat after me: the use case that fits this does not involve package managers, externa
328.
by orf 2y ago
> Well if you're trying to sell me "compatibility" you've got to do better than that No, I’ve got to sell you what you want. And if you don’t want a compatibility relationship between package versions, then it’s an ea
329.
by orf 2y ago
You literally can shove three incrementing numbers into a version and call it compatible, as long as the numbers increment. That’s the only compatibility requirement.
330.
by orf 2y ago
My laptop is compatible with USB-C, as is my toothbrush. Stop being needlessly and incorrectly pedantic about a highly context dependent and loosely defined word like “compatible”.

More ›